Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A hydrogen nucleus consists of a single proton. A 2-hydrogen (deuterium) nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron. A tritium nucleus consists of a proton and two neutrons.

This makes me wonder how an atomic nucleus made of a proton and a "minus one neutron" would look like, and the closest thing to a "minus one neutron" I can imagine is an antineutron.

What happens if we combine a proton and an antineutron? Are things like this even possible?

If such a thing is an atomic nucleus, can we add an electron and get an atom?

Edit: in the comments below, I also asked this more specific question (I suppose it's useful to also mention it here in order not to create a complete chaos):

If the proton and antineutron annihilate, is it still possible that the thing they annihilate to remains somehow stable enough to behave like an atomic nucleus?

share|cite|improve this question
Ok, but this raises two more questions: (1) what about at other energies or some other circumstances? (2) If it annihilates, is it still possible that the thing it annihilates to remains somehow stable enough to behave like an atomic nucleus? – Dejan Govc Dec 27 '11 at 11:22
Since an antineutron is made of quarks -u, -d, -d and a proton is made of quarks u, u, d, I can imagine what remains is a particle made of two quarks: u and -d. According to that could be a pion or a charged rho meson ... Could it behave like an atomic nucleus? – Dejan Govc Dec 27 '11 at 11:29
@DejanGovc Don't imagine that the annihilation works neatly every time. There are virtual quark pairs that contribute to the nucleon (that why I write "valence content"), and this is an energetic event and there is plenty of energy around for making light hadrons and leptons. – dmckee Dec 27 '11 at 16:36
@DejanGovc, kinetic energy of the resulting pions is too high to form a nucleus. See also pionium. It can be created by low-energy pions but it has a short lifetime. – voix Dec 27 '11 at 18:43
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Given that the valence quark content of a proton is $(uud)$ and that of a anti-neutron in $(\overline{udd})$ the answer is that sooner later some of the constituent quarks will annihilate and you get a spray assorted particles.

The lifetime of such a nucleus will depend on it's orbital angular momentum, with s-states being very short lived and high angular momentum states lasting a little longer.

share|cite|improve this answer

In addition to dmckee's answer this link summarizes the experiments of antiprotons catching protons and neutrons, creating temporary nuclei.

It is the symmetric state to the one in the question : an anti-proton-neutron nucleus that lasts for a bit (fig 5.7). Anti-protons can be made in abundance and controlled experimentally because they are charged, anti-neutrons do not give easy handles.

share|cite|improve this answer
1 Just what I wanted for Christmas! – dmckee Dec 27 '11 at 16:39

protected by Qmechanic Jun 8 '13 at 16:27

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.