Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was studying Rayleigh-Jean's formula. The author has assumed a cubical cavity of each side $L$ with perfectly reflecting surfaces. According to author, there are two perpendicular directions of polarization for a standing wave taken in arbitrary direction. I am stuck up here, my question is why two directions of polarization?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

It is possible because there are two linearly-independent solutions for wave-equation of the light traveling in the direction $\vec n$. Let $\vec n$ coincides with z axis then there are two polarizations for $\vec E$: x- and y-. Every wave of light traveling along z axis may be seen as superposition of two waves with x- and y- polarizations.

share|cite|improve this answer

I had a huge problem with this question last winter, and I absolutley could not come up a reasonable way of fitting in two directions of polarization. In fact, I could not fit a standing wave into a cubical cavity without having the polarization varying eveywhere. I came up with a pattern that seemed to work, but it gave me a multiplicity of 3 orientations. I am sure the pattern is right, but there is no factor of 3 in the Rayleigh-Jeans formula, so I just don't get it. Here is the pattern I came up with:

Rectangular Standing Wave Modes

The green lines are the electric fields, which must be either perpendicular (two walls) or null (third wall) to the boundaries. The pink lines are the magnetic fields which can be parallel to the walls. You can set up this pattern, as far as I can see, in three different orientations: but in the formula for counting the modes, there is no factor of three:

(From the hyperphysics web page)

I discuss this problem in more detail in my blogpost, "Counting Modes".

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.