Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It is well known that Maxwell equations can be made symmetric w.r.t. $E$ and $B$ by introducing non-zero magnetic charge density/flux.

In this case we have $div B = \rho_m$, where $\rho_m$ is a magnetic charge density.

But this means that $B$ cannot be expressed as the curl of vector potential anymore.

Does it mean that it is impossible to develop electrodynamics of non-zero electric and magnetic charges in terms of vector and scalar potentials? What happens to $U(1)$ gauge invariance then?

P.S.: I know that for the point-like magnetic charge vector potential can still be introduced, but not in the entire space. My question is related to non point-like magnetic charge densities.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Although in the presence of magnetic monopoles $\mathbf{B}$ can no longer be expressed as the curl of a vector potential, it can still be written as the sum of the curl of a vector potential and the gradient of a scalar potential:

$\mathbf{B} = \nabla\Xi + \nabla\times \mathbf{A}$

This is a consequence of Helmholtz's theorem.

So, electrodynamics can still be developed in terms of vector and scalar potentials, most straightforwardly by the introduction of an additional, magnetic scalar potential. Furthermore, the U(1) symmetry of electrodynamics is not broken by the introduction of monopoles; see this review by Milstead and Weinberg for a discussion of monopoles and electrodynamic symmetries.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.