Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is a simple bare-bones description of exchange interaction between two electrons?

For instance, it seems to me that the only necessary ingredients are the Coulomb interaction and the requirement that the total wavefunction be antisymmetric.

share|cite|improve this question
Your intuition is correct. A mathematical description of how those two ingredients conspire to create exchange interactions can be found in Ashcroft & Mermin (chapter 32) [this is a pretty standard calculation and I'm sure it appears in a lot of other places too] – wsc Dec 17 '11 at 20:34
Its in Griffiths intro quantum textbook as well. Somewhere. – BebopButUnsteady Dec 17 '11 at 20:59
It has nothing to do with the Coulomb force, there would be an exchange interaction between two uncharged but indistinguishable bosons as well. – joseph f. johnson Dec 18 '11 at 5:41
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Exchange interaction is an addition to other interactions between identical particles caused by permutation symmetry.

This addition is a result of specific form of multi-particle wave function. It gives no contribution to Hamiltonian unlike "usual" interactions but appears as an additional term in equations for single-particle wave functions (e.g. Hartree-Fock equation).

Interaction usually associated with energy and forces. We could find the exchange correction as a force added to Coulomb forces, but we should understand first what is force in quantum system.

Let's consider two fermions with single-particle coordinate wave functions $\psi_a(x)$ and $\psi_b(x)$ and spin wave fucntions $\phi_a(s)$ and $\phi_b(s)$. The possible two-particle wave fucntions are singlet with symmetric coordinate part $$ \Psi_S(x_1, x_2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left[ \psi_a(x_1)\psi_b(x_2) + \psi_a(x_2)\psi_b(x_1) \right] $$ and triplet with antisymmetric coordinate part $$ \Psi_A(x_1, x_2) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left[ \psi_a(x_1)\psi_b(x_2) - \psi_a(x_2)\psi_b(x_1) \right] $$

Let the two-particle Hamiltonian do not depend on spins: $$ \hat{H} = \frac{\hat{\mathbf{p}}_1 + \hat{\mathbf{p}}_2}{2m} + V(x_1, x_2) $$ then the average energy of the interaction will be: $$ U_S = \left<\Psi_S\right|V\left|\Psi_S\right> = U + U_\text{ex} $$ $$ = \left<\psi_a(x_1)\psi_b(x_2)\right|V\left|\psi_a(x_1)\psi_b(x_2)\right> + \left<\psi_a(x_1)\psi_b(x_2)\right|V\left|\psi_a(x_2)\psi_b(x_1)\right> $$ $$ U_A = \left<\Psi_A\right|V\left|\Psi_A\right> = U - U_\text{ex} $$ $$ = \left<\psi_a(x_1)\psi_b(x_2)\right|V\left|\psi_a(x_1)\psi_b(x_2)\right> - \left<\psi_a(x_1)\psi_b(x_2)\right|V\left|\psi_a(x_2)\psi_b(x_1)\right> $$

The term $U_\text{ex}$ is not zero only if the particles are close enough to each other and their wave functions overlap (see picture below). In classical limit when distance $L$ is big the overlapping is zero and $U_S=U_A=U$

enter image description here

Let's assume that $\psi_a$ and $\psi_b$ are non-negative everywhere anv $V$ acts as Coulomb interaction (i.e. positive and decreases when the distance increases). Then $U$ and $U_\text{ex}$ are positive and energy of symmetric coordinate state (opposite spines) is higher than energy of antisymmetric coordinate state (similar spines). If the average positions of the particles are fixed the exchange interaction will put the spins same direction.

The force of interaction between the particles can be defined as the generalized force corresponding to the parameter L: $$ F = -\frac{\partial U}{\partial L} $$ Within our assumptions concerning $\psi_a$, $\psi_b$ and $V$ the derivative of both $U$ and $U_\text{ex}$ are negative. Hence the "usual" force is positive (repulsion) and the exchange force is positive for symmetric coordinate state and negative for antisymmetric coordinate state (attraction).

enter image description here

So the exchange interaction for the case of two particles can be considered as additional force depending on spin configuration. For multiple particles this is more complicated.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.