Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I understand this right the Ricci flow on a compact manifold given by

$\partial g_{\mu \nu} = - 2R_{\mu \nu} + \frac{2}{n}\!R_{\alpha}^{\alpha} \,g_{\mu \nu}$

tends to expand negatively curved regions and to shrink positively curved regions.

Looking at the above definition I`m wondering if the parameter n can be used to achieve $\partial g_{\mu \nu} = 0 $ even if the Ricci tensor is not zero such that the validity of physics, that depends on the metric to be constant (as a precondition), could be extrapolated to curved manifolds to describe an expanding universe with a positive cosmological constant?

share|cite|improve this question
Ive just seen that at theoretical physics SE a related question is asked:‌​cosmological-constant-and-microscopic-properties-of-stri So Ill observe both places for answers. – Dilaton Dec 11 '11 at 23:45
up vote 3 down vote accepted

I get the impression that OP is referring to Normalized Ricci Flow (NRF):

$$ \frac{1}{2} \partial_t g_{\mu\nu} ~=~ -R_{\mu\nu} + \frac{\langle R \rangle}{n} g_{\mu\nu}~. $$

Here $\langle R \rangle$ is the average scalar curvature over the full space-time $M$. The average procedure is often weighted with an Einstein-Hilbert Boltzmann factor. It is just a number (as opposed to a space-time dependent scalar quantity).

Also $n$ is the space-time dimension, which is fixed, and hence cannot be easily varied as OP suggests.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks @Qmechanics You are right ... – Dilaton Dec 17 '11 at 11:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.