Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For a single charge $e$ with position vector $\textbf R$, the charge density $\rho$ and and current density $\textbf{j}$ are fiven by:

\begin{equation} \rho(\textbf{r},t)= e\,\delta(r-\textbf{R}(t))\end{equation}

\begin{equation} \textbf{j}(\textbf{r},t)=e\frac{d\textbf{R}}{dt}\delta(\textbf{r}-\textbf{R}(t))\end{equation}

Suppose we want to check the equation of continuity

\begin{equation}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+\nabla \cdot\textbf{j}=0 \end{equation}

How to do it? How to deal with the derivatives of a delta function? Thanks

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

It is almost no trouble to generalize to a finite number of point charges $q_i$ at positions ${\bf r}_i(t)$. Then the charge density is

$$ \rho({\bf r},t)~ =~ \sum_i q_i \delta^3({\bf r}-{\bf r}_i(t)), $$

and the current density

$$ {\bf j}({\bf r},t)~ =~ \sum_i q_i \dot{\bf r}_i(t)\delta^3({\bf r}-{\bf r}_i(t)). $$

For clarity let us write ${\bf \nabla}\equiv\frac{\partial}{\partial {\bf r}}.$ The chain rule then yields the continuity equation

$$ -\frac{\partial \rho({\bf r},t)}{\partial t} ~=~ -\sum_i q_i \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\delta^3({\bf r}-{\bf r}_i(t)) ~=~ \sum_i q_i \dot{\bf r}_i(t)\cdot \frac{\partial }{\partial {\bf r}}\delta^3({\bf r}-{\bf r}_i(t)) $$ $$~=~ \frac{\partial }{\partial {\bf r}} \cdot \sum_i q_i \dot{\bf r}_i(t)\delta^3({\bf r}-{\bf r}_i(t))~=~\frac{\partial }{\partial {\bf r}} \cdot {\bf j}({\bf r},t).$$

The same calculation can be repeated more carefully with the help of test functions.

share|improve this answer
add comment

You're no longer dealing with real-valued functions on $\mathbb R^4$, but with distributions, and you need to evaluate expressions by integrating over a test function $\varphi$:

$$ \begin{align*} &\int_{\mathbb R^4}\left(\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}(\mathbf r,t) + \nabla\cdot\mathbf j(\mathbf r,t)\right)\varphi(\mathbf r,t)\;\mathrm d(\mathbf r,t) \\= &\int_{\mathbb R^4}\left(e\frac\partial{\partial t}\delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf R(t))\varphi(\mathrm r,t) + \sum_{i=1}^3e\dot R_i(t)\frac\partial{\partial x^i}\delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf R(t))\varphi(\mathrm r,t)\right)\;\mathrm d(\mathbf r,t) \\=&\int_{\mathbb R^4}\left(-e\delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf R(t))\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial t}(\mathbf r,t)-\sum_{i=1}^3e\dot R_i(t)\delta(\mathbf r - \mathbf R(t))\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial x^i}(\mathbf r,t)\right)\;\mathrm d(\mathbf r,t) \\=&\int_\mathbb R\left(-e\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial t}(\mathbf R(t),t)-\sum_{i=1}^3e\dot R_i(t)\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial x^i}(\mathbf R(t),t)\right)\;\mathrm dt \\=&\int_\mathbb R -e\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dt}\varphi(\mathbf R(t),t)\;\mathrm dt \\=&\left[-e\varphi(\mathbf R(t),t)\right]^\infty_{t=-\infty} \\=&0 \end{align*} $$

The second equality looks like integration by parts as $\varphi$ has compact support (ie in particular vanishes at infinity), but is actually the definition of the derivative of a distribution.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.