Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there an easy way to look at a partial different equation and get a sense of what kind of phenomena it is physically describing? I have an equation that looks like this:

$\partial_tA=C_3\partial^2_{xx}A+C_2\partial_x\left(vA\right)+C_1A+C_0$

From inspecting it and doing some searching, it seemed like it might be trying to describe a phenomena that had advection and diffusion occurring at the same time. Is this a correct interpretation?

Note that $C_3>0$, $C_2<0$, $C_1<0$, $C_0>0$ and $v(x,t)$ is velocity. I'm not sure, but it seems reasonable to assume velocity can be either negative or positive. Also, $A(x,t)$ should be positive.

Note that I'm not looking for a solution to the equation, just the physical interpretation of what kind of physics would be involved.

share|improve this question
    
Have you managed to check if it's in Polyanin's books? –  user172 Nov 28 '11 at 18:22
    
What about the sign of the constants $A$, $v$, $C_i$? –  Christian Blatter Nov 28 '11 at 20:09
3  
In general, questions are not supposed to be cross-posted, not unless you've tried and failed to get any useful input on one site. So we'll probably wind up closing either this or the one on the math site. –  David Z Nov 28 '11 at 21:14
    
@David Zaslavsky: Thanks for letting me know. I understand. I will avoid cross-posting in the future. –  Henry B. Nov 29 '11 at 0:33

3 Answers 3

up vote 15 down vote accepted

Let us try to rewrite the equation in approximate form of finite differences: $$\frac{A(x,t+\Delta t)-A(x,t)}{\Delta t} = C_3\frac{A(x+h,t)+A(x-h,t)-2A(x,t)}{h^2} +$$ $$+ C_2 \frac{v(x+h,t)A(x+h,t)-v(x-h,t)A(x-h,t)}{2h} + C_1 A(x,t)+C_0$$ Where $\Delta t$ -- is a time step, and $h$ -- space step.
The expression becomes your PDE, in the limit $\Delta t\to0, h\to0$.

The left hand side describes how much the quantity $A$ changes during a time step at a given point (hope that is obvious). Let us see what is on right hand side term-by-term:

  • $C_3$: If $A$ is larger in total at "neighboring" points than in the point itself: $A(x+h,t)+A(x-h,t)>2A(x,t)$ then $A$ will increase at $x$. Otherwise it will decrease. So the term "forces" $A$ to some kind of local equilibrium.
    This is a standard term for description of various diffusion or heat distribution processes that forces your system to some equilibrium.
  • $C_2$: Here one have to be careful with signs. Let us call $x+h$ "the point to the right" and $x-h$ will be "the point to the left". If $v>0$ then it "flows to the right" and if $v<0$ it "flows to the left". Now you check that if your flow goes into your point $x$ (say, flows to the right from point to the left) then it increases $A$ at $x$. And decreases if flows goes away from your point.
    That is a standard term that describes stuff carried with the flow $v$ and usually derived in terms of substantial derivative
  • $C_1$ and $C_0$: These two are trivial, because they are local. $C_0$ just gives a constant contribution to growth of $A$, and $C_1$ changes (inhibits in your case) the growth rate proportional to the value of $A$.
    You can also understand them in terms of local ODE for a given point: $\dot{a} = C_1a+C_0$

To sum it up: let us say that $A(x,t)$ describes density of, say, bacteria in a tube. Then $C_3$ describes how they diffuse around, $C_2$ describes how they are carried by a stream $v(x,t)$ of liquid in the tube, $C_0$ -- is a growth rate of new bacteria, and, finally, $C_1$ -- is responsible for the growth to slow down from the overpopulation.

share|improve this answer
    
This is an incredibly good and useful answer. I wish I had another vote. –  Henry B. Nov 29 '11 at 0:34
1  
In the bacteria interpretation, $C_0$ is really an immigration rate, not a growth rate: new bacteria appear even if none were present initially. $C_1$, however, can indeed be interpreted as a density-independent per capita mortality (and/or emigration) rate. –  Ilmari Karonen Nov 29 '11 at 16:43

You have a thin cylindrical tube along the $x$-axis that is filled with some gas of density $\rho(x,t)$. The temperature of the gas is $A(x,t)$, and the gas is moving along with "mass flux" $m(x,t):=\rho(x,t)v(x,t)$, where $v$ denotes the actual speed of individual particles. (The $\rho$ is missing in your equation). Heat is transported through heat conduction and by means of convection. In addition the $x$-axis is an electrical wire which produces heat hat a constant rate, and at the surface of the tube we have a heat loss towards outer space, the latter being a temperature $0$.

Your equation describes the temporal change rate of temperature in a "length element" at $x$ at time $t$. The individual terms on the right side account for the contributions of conduction, convection, surface loss to outer space, and heating.

share|improve this answer

As an alternative to Christian Blatter's heat interpretation, $A$ might describe the concentration of particles adsorbed onto a one-dimensional substrate surface (or a two-dimensional one, where we ignore one of the dimensions).

  • New particles are adsorbed at rate $C_0$ per unit length.
  • Adsorbed particles detach from the surface at rate $-C_1$ per particle.
  • The particles move along the surface (or the surface itself moves) with mean net velocity $-C_2 v$.
  • While moving, the particles also diffuse over the surface with diffusion coefficient $C_3$.

In any case, this equation describes the dynamics of some quantity $A$ undergoing diffusion and advection over a one-dimensional space, while also undergoing constant (i.e. zeroth-order) local accumulation and first-order decay.

(As a mathematical ecologist, my first thought was to interpret it as a spatial population model, but it doesn't really fit that interpretation very well: there's no $A^2$ term that could describe local density regulation.)

share|improve this answer
    
This is an intriguing interpretation. Where can I find more on this way of looking at it? –  Henry B. Nov 29 '11 at 1:59

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.