Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

That I could create as a classical mechanics class project? Other than the classical examples that we see in textbooks (catenary, brachistochrone, Fermat, etc..)

share|cite|improve this question

closed as not constructive by David Z Oct 28 '12 at 12:07

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

As this is a list-making question I am converting it to Community wiki consistent with our policy on reference requests and the like. I'll be opening a topic on meta concerning this whole class of questions shortly. – dmckee Nov 29 '11 at 16:09

Here is one I just made up, but it has a nice flavor--- suppose you have a 2-d bullet going very fast through a 2-d gas. The gas molecules reflects specularly off the bullet, making glancing collisions. What shape of bullet of a fixed area has the least drag?

This problem gives

$$\int {1\over 1+y'^2} + \lambda y dx $$

And the equation for y' you get is

$$ y' = \lambda x (1 - 2 y'^2 - y'^4) $$


$$ y = \int \lambda x ( 1 - 2 y^2 - y^4) $$

Which you can solve in a series by plugging in $y={\lambda x^2\over 2}$ and iterating a few times using the relation above as a recursion.

share|cite|improve this answer

While studying classical mechanics I did the following simulation:

  1. Consider a motion in Coulomb potential: $U(r) = \frac{\alpha}{r}$
  2. Fix starting and final points $p_1$ and $p_2$, and consider different paths in a form: $$p_1 + (p_2 - p_1)\lambda + \vec{a}\sin(\pi\lambda) + \vec{b}\sin(2\pi\lambda) + \vec{c}\sin(3\pi\lambda)$$ Where $\lambda$ is the parameter along our path and $\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c}$ are 2D vectors, that parametrize it.
  3. Take some initial parameters $(\vec{a},\vec{b},\vec{c})$ and calculate the action along the path by means of Maupertuis' principle.
  4. Make a small random change in $\vec{a}' = \vec{a} + \mbox{random },\vec{b}' = \vec{b} + \mbox{random }$ and $\vec{c}' = \vec{c} + \mbox{random}$.
  5. Calculate the action for $(\vec{a}',\vec{b}',\vec{c}')$ parameters. If action becomes smaller -- replace the parameters with new values $\vec{a}=\vec{a}',\vec{b}=\vec{b}',\vec{c}=\vec{c}'$.
  6. Goto step 4.

Here is what I've got in the end:

enter image description hereenter image description here

Here $\alpha = -200, p_1 = (0,-5)$ and $p_2 = (0.17,-0.17)$.
Numbers on top are: left ("Шаг") -- is a step number in the simulation, right ("Действие") -- is the value of the Maupertuis' action.

Red and green lines are real trajectories in the potential and the black line is my "test trajectory". So one can see that the simple random walk in parameter space can find some of the real paths of the body.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.