Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Extending the Gaussian model by introducing a second field and coupling it to the other field, I consider the Hamiltonian

$$\beta H = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^d} \int_0^\Lambda d^d q \frac{t + Kq^2}{2} |m(q)|^2 + \frac{L}{2} q^4 |\phi|^2 + v q^2 m(q) \phi^*(q)$$

Doing a Renormalization Group treatment, I integrate out the high wave-numbers above $\Lambda/b$ and obtain the following recursion relations for the parameters: $$\begin{aligned}t' &= b^{-d} z^2 t & K' &= b^{-d-2}z^2 K & L' &= b^{-d-4}y^2 L \\ v' &= b^{-d-2}yz v & h' &= zh \end{aligned}$$ where $z$ is the scaling of field $m$ and $y$ is the scaling of field $\phi$.

One way to obtain the scaling factors $z$ and $y$ is to demand that $K' = K$ and $L' = L$, i.e., we demand that fluctuations are scale invariant.

But apparently, there is another fixed point if we demand that $t' = t$ and $L' = L$ which gives rise to different scaling behavior, and I wonder

a) why I can apparently choose which parameters should be fixed regardless of their value ($K$ and $L$ in one case, $t$ and $L$ in the other case)

b) what the physical meaning of these two different fixed points is...

(My exposure to field theory/RG is from a statistical physics approach, so if answers could be phrased in that language as opposed to QFT that'd be much appreciated)

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

The short answer is that if you have coefficients for all the terms, you have two independent exact fake scale invariance for the field $\phi$ and $m$ which just rescales the fields and the coefficients appropriately to keep the Hamiltonian exactly the same. This is not a real invariance of the action, since it changes the parameters of the action, it is best thought of as choosing the dimensional scale of the two fields. You usually do this by fixing the terms "L" and "K", but you get a different scaling if you fix the "t" and "L" terms, which is physical in different limits.

I should point out that this model is exactly solvable, there are no real interactions in this model, so the Renormalization Group analysis is just dimensional analysis in disguise. There are two rotated q-modes mixing $m(q)$ and $\phi(q)$ which are completely free.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.