Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

i saw this Lagrangian in notes i have printed:

$$ L(x,dx/dt) = (m^2(dx/dt)^4)/12 + m(dx/dt)^2*V(x) -V^2(x) $$

what is it? is it physical? it seems like it doesn't have the right units of energy,


share|improve this question
It should be noted that this Lagrangian appears in Goldstein's first chapter excercises. –  jinawee Feb 1 at 23:13
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 11 down vote accepted


$$L~=~\frac{1}{3}T^2+2TV-V^2, \qquad T~:=~\frac{m}{2}\dot{x}^2. $$

Lagrange equation:

$$2(T-V)V^{\prime}~=~\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} ~=~ \frac{d}{dt} \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}}\right) ~=~ \frac{d}{dt} \left[\left(\frac{2}{3}T +2V\right)m\dot{x}\right] $$ $$~=~ \left(\frac{2}{3}T +2V\right)m\ddot{x} + \left(\frac{2}{3}m\dot{x}\ddot{x} +2V^{\prime}\dot{x}\right)m\dot{x} ~=~ 2(T+V)m\ddot{x} +4TV^{\prime}, $$ or,

$$- 2(T+V)V^{\prime}~=~ 2(T+V)m\ddot{x}. $$

In other words, one gets Newton's second law$^1$

$$ m\ddot{x}~=~-V^{\prime}. \qquad\qquad\qquad(N2) $$

So the Lagrangian $L$ is equivalent to the usual $T-V$ at the classical level.


$^1$ One may wonder about the second branch $T+V=0$, but since $T+V={\rm const}$ is a first integral to (N2), the second branch is already included in the first branch (N2).

share|improve this answer
thanks but i can't understand how comes [L]= energy and [T]= energy and L ~ T^2??? –  0x90 Nov 24 '11 at 21:22
The Lagrangian does not have to have dimension of energy in classical mechanics. For instance, if one scales a Lagrangian with a dimensionful (non-zero) constant, the equations of motion will stay the same. –  Qmechanic Nov 24 '11 at 21:29
but L =T-U, i can't get it. –  0x90 Nov 24 '11 at 21:30
No,L=T-U is only one possible Lagrangian, namely the (simplest) one that describes Newtonian mechanics. In general the Lagrangian can be anything as long as it is a function of the proper variables (and is dimensionally consistent). –  David Z Nov 25 '11 at 5:28
@ZoZo123 Qmechanic's point is the $\mathcal{L}' = \mathcal{L} \times 10\text{ m} = (T-U)\times 10\text{ m}$ has different dimensions, but can still be used to get the same equations of motion, so clearly there is no requirement that a Lagrangian have units of energy. –  dmckee Nov 26 '11 at 19:35
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.