Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given a metric

$$ ds^{2}~=~ g_{a,b}dx^{a}dx^{b}. $$

Here Einstein's summation convention is assumed for $a$ and $b$.

Then given the Laplacian over that metric, can then we find a metric $ g_{a,b} $ so

$$ \Delta _{g}f ~=~ - \nabla^2 f +V(x)f. $$

  • the first term on the left is the Laplacian operator in curvilinear coordinates.

  • the term on the right is just the ${\rm div}({\rm grad})f$ in Euclidean coordinates.

  • $V(x)$ is a potential in $n$-dimensions.

The idea, if this is possible, is to turn physical problems into geometrical problems, for example solving the Schroedinger equation would be equivalent to solve a Dirichlet problem for some Laplacian.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Unfortunately, this is not a good idea. The Beltrami-Laplacian $\Delta_{g}$ is in local coordinates given as

$$ \Delta_{g}\Psi ~=~ \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}\left(\sqrt{g}~ g^{ij} \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x^j} \right). $$

A nice feature of $\Delta_{g}$ is that it takes a scalar $\Psi$ into a scalar $\Delta_{g}\Psi$.

Most importantly, a decomposition

$$\Delta_{g}\Psi~=~g^{ij}\frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^i\partial x^j} + \frac{1}{2} g^{ij} \left(\frac{\partial \ln g}{\partial x^i}\right) \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x^j} $$

would not contain a zero-order term that could be identified with a potential $V$, but rather a first-order term.

Finally, let me mention that for a generic metric $g_{ij}=g_{ij}(x)$ on a 3-dimensional Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ (rather than just curvilinear coordinates for $\mathbb{R}^3$), it might not be possible to find flat coordinates in an open neighborhood, as also discussed here (in the context of GR).

share|cite|improve this answer

For scalar $f$s, no. Given two metrics $g_{ij}$ and $h_{ij}$, the difference in their corresponding Laplace-Beltrami operators on scalar functions is

$$ \triangle_g f - \triangle_h f = \tilde{\Gamma}^i \partial_i f $$

where $\tilde{\Gamma}^i$ is the difference of the traces of the connection coefficients for the metrics $g$ and $h$

$$ \tilde{\Gamma}^{i} = g^{jk}{}^{(g)}\Gamma_{jk}^i - h^{jk}{}^{(h)}\Gamma_{jk}^i $$

And so in particular it cannot be a scalar potential $V\cdot f$.

One can also quite simply see this fact by noting that for $V(x)$ not identically vanishing, if $f$ is the constant function 1, then $\triangle_g f = 0$ on your left hand side, but on your right hand side $\nabla f = 0$ while $V(x) f(x) = V(x) \neq 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.