Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I read that

$(FF(f))(x)=2\pi f(-x)$, where $F$ is the Fourier transform

and $F(f(x-a))(k)=\exp(-ika) X(k)$ where $X(k)=F(f(x))$

implies $F(\exp(iax)f(x))(k)=X(k-a)$.

But I don't see how that is done... I am quite happy with getting $F^{-1}X(k-a)=\exp(iax)f(x)$ by brute force calculation. I would like to see how to use duality though.

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off topic by Colin K, Qmechanic, David Z Nov 15 '11 at 21:02

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1 may be! – MBN Nov 15 '11 at 11:58
@MBN: Okay, thanks. – paul Nov 15 '11 at 12:10
Now posted at – Qmechanic Nov 15 '11 at 18:11

You need to know the basic Fourier transform delta-function identity

$$ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{ikx} {dk\over 2\pi} = \delta(x) $$

Which implies Fourier inversion. Proving this identity is slightly subtle, because the right hand side is a distribution, but you can do the integral explicitly over a long interval from -M to M to get an object which has a unit integral and is shrinking in size with M as 1/M, so it must be a delta-function in any reasonable sense of limits.

The double fourier-transform is

$$ FF(f) (x') = \int dk e^{ix'k} (\int dk e^{ikx} f(x)) $$

And you can do the k integral using the identity to get the result.

share|cite|improve this answer

There are quite a few good dualities involving Fourier transforms and they are all really good to know. The one you are dealing with is quite descriptive. First consider an wavefunction in the time domain. Multiplying it by an exponential is like modulating an AM radio signal: it adds two sidebands to the frequency spectrum which are images of the original signal, displaced by plus/minus the multiplying frequency. This is how it works for sine wave modulation: for exponential modulation, its only one sideband, so you get simple displacement.

This is one half of the duality. To bring it full circle, you now have to do the complimentary problem: take a signal in the time domain, delay it by a fixed time T, and ask what this does to the spectrum in the frequency domain. Obviously, it has to contain all the same frequencies, and to the exact same amplitude. Multiplication by an exponential...any exponential...obviously does this. So far so good. But that is far from proving the duality. An argument of phase delays can actually tie things together in a fairly convincing way. That's pretty much how I understand it.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.