Tell me more ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

During times of recessions and jobless recoveries, plenty of physics occupations have been cut and slashed, with hiring freezes. Can anyone knowledgeable give some good advice on which physics occupations and fields are most recession-proof, and secure even during times of jobless recoveries?

share|improve this question
Although this is a very practical question, it's not really about physics, and it doesn't fall under any of the categories in our FAQ, so I think it's off topic. But if people in the community are largely in support of having questions like this, I can reopen it. – David Zaslavsky Nov 12 '11 at 6:19
I think it's off-topic, too. It's also very elementary. Obviously, tenured academic jobs are completely recession-proof. Some of the disciplines probably benefit out of any recession. Commercial sectors such as construction etc. suffer more than others and their physicists and secreataries and everyone else with them. – Luboš Motl Nov 12 '11 at 8:09

closed as off topic by David Zaslavsky Nov 12 '11 at 6:17

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined in the FAQ. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about closed questions here.

1 Answer

Short-answer: Large multinational collaboration, see LHC, Super-K, SNO, Daya Bay, Icecube, etc., and defense/national security related, see MIT Lincoln Labs, Quantum Computing, etc. are safest funding wise

Long-Answer: If you are thinking about a career in physics and are just looking for a job that can guarantee funding for x no. of years, you should reconsider said career in physics. In teh current political climate everything is up for grabs or being defunded at for any reason. Moreover, do what you want to do as a physicist and not what the funding agency tells you what to do (you are not a professor yet). Particle Physics might be a save haven funding wise, but sitting in front of a computer writing code might not be your thing. Same idea with quantum computing, you may not like working with LHe or in a clean room. Sure they are safe funding-wise, but are you happy or come to your full potential - No. If we were all worried about funding or recession proofness, nobody would be a theoretical physicist unless they are really good. And at the end of the day TAs are always needed.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.