Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why is the Dirac operator considered so important - in both physics and (pure) mathematics?

share|cite|improve this question
define important - what would you say is the importance of the Dirac operator in pure mathematics? – lurscher Nov 14 '11 at 12:32
Let's be fair: it was invented within physics, for physicists, by a physicist. It may have ancillary relevance to maths, but not huge. @lurscher is also right; what's "important" here? – Noldorin Nov 14 '11 at 22:07
up vote 3 down vote accepted

It should be obvious why the Dirac operator is important in physics because of fermions. In mathematics, one could mention the following incomplete list.

  1. Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem for the (twisted) spin complex, see e.g., Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics, 1990; or Berline, Getzler and Vergne, Heat Kernels and Dirac Operators, 2004.

  2. Connes's noncommutative differential geometry.

  3. Schrödinger–Lichnerowicz formula.

  4. Kostant's cubic Dirac operator.

For further information, see also nLab.

share|cite|improve this answer

Because it describes spinors (i.e. behavior of fermions). String Theory speaks about both bosons and fermions... when passing to a QFT, fermionic wavefunctions become spinor fields, and their dynamics require the Dirac operator. And this is where all the mathematical importance stems from: QFT and String Theory (topological field theories) is a pure math theory. In particular, I disagree completely with Noldorin's seemingly naive comment... Clifford algebras and spinors on manifolds is a huge field.

Sorry if this too brief of an explanation (for immediate purposes).

share|cite|improve this answer
Hi. Please feel free to elaborate whenever you're interested. :) I can then upvote your answer. – UGPhysics Nov 17 '11 at 18:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.