Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the literature (Kirchhoff G. - Mechanic (1897), Lecture 18 or Lamb, H. - Hydrodynamics (1879)) one can find the following analytical closed form expression for the gravitational potential of homogeneous ellipsoid of unit density, whose surface is given by \begin{equation} \frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}+\frac{z^2}{c^2}=1 \;. \end{equation} Gravitational point for internal points is \begin{equation} \Omega=\pi abc\int_0^\infty\left(1-\frac{x^2}{a^2+\lambda}-\frac{y^2}{b^2+\lambda}-\frac{z^2}{c^2+\lambda}\right)\frac{d\lambda}{\Delta} \end{equation} and for external points \begin{equation} \Omega=\pi abc\int_u^\infty\left(1-\frac{x^2}{a^2+\lambda}-\frac{y^2}{b^2+\lambda}-\frac{z^2}{c^2+\lambda}\right)\frac{d\lambda}{\Delta} \;, \end{equation} where \begin{equation} \Delta=\sqrt{(a^2+\lambda)(b^2+\lambda)(c^2+\lambda)} \end{equation} and $u$ is the positive root of equation \begin{equation} \frac{x^2}{a^2+u}+\frac{y^2}{b^2+u}+\frac{z^2}{c^2+u}=1 \;. \end{equation}

The expressions in these formulas appear similar to confocal ellipsoidal coordinates.

How can these formulas be derived? (perhaps something more readable than the original papers) Can they be derived in terms of ellipsoidal harmonics?

share|improve this question
    
Consider the equation you have to solve, $\Delta \phi \propto \rho$. Since the Laplace is separable in these coordinates, the above expression can be derived. I am sure that it is done in a lot of standard textbooks on continuum mechanics where I would point you. Greets –  Robert Filter Oct 31 '11 at 12:45
    
Is there a standard textbook which contains such a derivation? –  liberias Oct 31 '11 at 21:16
    
physics.stackexchange.com/questions/2687/… would be the place to look for that. –  David Z Nov 1 '11 at 0:44
    
still not found, any references and ideas are welcome :) –  liberias Nov 2 '11 at 23:42
    
The other way around: springerlink.com/content/p866587864k0wg83 –  liberias Nov 18 '11 at 10:15
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

This is a very late answer. There is the book

Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium

by the god himself in this field S. Chandrasekhar. Chapter 3 is devoted fully to understanding the gravitational potentials of ellipsoids. Theorems 3 and 9 are what you are looking for.

You also asked

Can they be derived in terms of ellipsoidal harmonics?

Chandrasekhar does not derive the equations in terms of ellipsoidal harmonics. In fact, he states that very early on in the introduction (section 16). Instead he employs spherical polar coordinates and proceeds by establishing a series of lemmas on the moments of the mass distribution. This amounts to considering integrals of the form $$I(u) = a_1 a_2 a_3 \int_u^{\infty} \frac{du}{\Delta}; \qquad A_i(u) = a_1 a_2 a_3 \int_u^{\infty} \frac{du}{\Delta (a_i^2 + u)}$$ where $\Delta^2=(a_1^2+u) (a_2^2+u) (a_3^2+u)$ and $a_i$ are the semi-major axes of the ellipsoid. Then come the two theorems you need

Theorem 3: At a point $x_i$ interior to the ellipsoid, the potential is $$\Phi = \pi G \rho \Big[I(0) - \sum_{i=1}^3 A_i(0) x_i^2 \Big]$$

Theorem 9: At a point $x_i$ exterior to the ellipsoid, the potential is $$\Phi = \pi G \rho \Big[I(\lambda) - \sum_{i=1}^3 A_i(\lambda) x_i^2 \Big]$$ where $\lambda$ is the positive root of $$\sum_{i=1}^3 \frac{x_i^2}{a_i^2 + \lambda} = 1$$

share|improve this answer
1  
Link-only answers are frowned upon. See fourth section here. Please provide a quote, or a paraphrasing/condensed form of the relevant section. –  Manishearth Apr 17 '12 at 4:40
1  
@Manishearth, Thanks for the comment. I am aware that link only answers are not encouraged. But since the OP had asked for a reference, I thought mentioning the book was sufficient. Besides I did also point to the specific sections/theorems. Anyway I have updated my answer now. –  Vijay Murthy Apr 17 '12 at 7:05
2  
+1 Great! Even for ref-requests, a condensed version is always better. If the material is huge, just outline what's being talked about. You seem to have done it well here. –  Manishearth Apr 17 '12 at 7:08
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.