Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In 3+1 dimensions with signature +1 -1 -1 -1,

$$ \mathcal{L}= \frac{1}{2}\partial^\mu\phi\partial_\mu\phi -\phi^2/2 -\phi^4/4$$

field equation: $$\square\phi+\phi+\phi^3=0$$ (check this)


Note that it is not a Mexican hat. I guess this haven't been solved exactly before but, somebody have shown or discarded that there could be soliton solutions or at least solitary waves?

share|improve this question
Your field equation is correct up to a choice of sign for the metric $\eta_{\mu \nu}.$ –  Gerben Oct 25 '11 at 17:50
oh yeah, I always use signature +1 -1 -1 -1 –  Anthonny Oct 25 '11 at 18:04
You need the opposite sign mass term, then there are solitons. –  Ron Maimon Oct 25 '11 at 20:22
Are you sure? I have a problem with this because I need that the asymptotic behaviour to be like $e^{-r}/r$ and if it were like you are saying it cant be possible. Or not? –  Anthonny Oct 25 '11 at 20:49
Sorry--- domain line--- its a wall in time. I wick rotated unconsciously. –  Ron Maimon Oct 26 '11 at 3:34

2 Answers 2

I would like to give you another solution to your equation that was recently published (see here). The equation


admits the exact solution

$$\phi(x)=\pm\sqrt{\frac{2\mu^4}{\mu_0^2 + \sqrt{\mu_0^4 + 2\lambda\mu^4}}}{\rm sn}\left(p\cdot x+\theta,\sqrt{\frac{-\mu_0^2 + \sqrt{\mu_0^4 + 2\lambda\mu^4}}{-\mu_0^2 - \sqrt{\mu_0^4 + 2\lambda\mu^4}}}\right) $$

being sn a Jacobi elliptic function, $\theta$ and $\mu$ two integration constants and provided that

$$ p^2=\mu_0^2+\frac{\lambda\mu^4}{\mu_0^2+\sqrt{\mu_0^4+2\lambda\mu^4}}. $$

This has the appearance of a dispersion relation and $p$ is a quasi-momentum as happens in solid state with quasi-particles in a strong interacting environment.

As pointed out before, this is not a soliton solution.

share|improve this answer
What does this answer have to do with the question? –  Ron Maimon Dec 6 '11 at 17:14
Dear @Jon. Don't forget to disclose if you are the author of the linked paper, cf. Physics.SE policy. –  Qmechanic Mar 6 '12 at 11:15
Dear @Qmechanic, as you can see this is not a secret. What really matters is if an argument is correct or not. –  Jon Mar 6 '12 at 20:49

The solution for the soliton in a $\phi^4$ model is given by making a field $\phi$ which depends only on x and t, and is independent of any other spatial dimensions. This is a classical one dimensional problem.

When the mass-squared parameter is negative, then the soliton appears. It is the solution to the equation

$$ \partial_x^2 \phi + \phi - \phi^3 = 0 $$

Where x is rescaled to absorb $\mu^2$, and $\phi$ is rescaled to absorb $\lambda$. The solution is gotten by using a version of conservation of energy, which works here because the above is a second order differential equation, which looks just like the motion of a particle in a potential

$$ V(\phi) = {1\over 2} \phi^2 - {1\over 4} \phi^4$$

Note that this is the inverted field potential appearing in the Lagrangian. The solution for $\phi$ has a x-conservation of x-energy, because if you call x "time", then the second order equation turns into Newton's laws for a one-dimensional motion. The conserved quantity is

$$ {1\over 2} (\partial_x \phi)^2 + V(\phi) = E$$

For the soliton solution, $\phi$ should go to the vacuum solution at $x=\pm\infty$. The two vacua are the two minima of the original potential, the places where

$$ \phi - \phi^3 = 0$$


$$\phi = \pm 1 $$

The potential at these field values gives the energy, because the field gradient has to go to zero at infinty. This makes the x-energy 1/4 at infinity.

The conservation of x-energy then tells you the field gradient

$$ (\partial\phi(x))^2 + \phi^2 - {1\over 2} \phi^4 = 1/2 $$

or that

$$ {1\over (\phi^2-1) } (\partial_x \phi) = \pm t+C $$


$$ \tanh^{-1} \phi = t+C $$

Which gives the standard $\phi^4$ domain wall soliton

$$ \phi(x) = \tanh(t+C)$$

This solution is a particle in 1d (1+1), a line in 2d (2+1), a domain wall in 3d (3+1), and in general, a d-1 dimensional object in d dimensions.

share|improve this answer
Your answer is fine. You have just to change the sign before the quartic term to agree with the OP's question. –  Jon Dec 6 '11 at 14:02
@Jon: No, the sign change is in the quadratic term. The negative mass is required for a soliton solution. –  Ron Maimon Dec 6 '11 at 17:10
Yes, but the original question was if the equation with a plus sign admits solitons. In agreement with your assertion, I display the exact solution in this case that is not a soliton. My answer and yours are complimentary and fully answer the OP's question. –  Jon Dec 6 '11 at 17:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.