Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How to start with a perfect fluid concept and reach (by approximations through certain mathematically well defined assumptions) to the concept of particle ? Here newtonian gravitation is being assumed. The state equation of matter can be assumed to be that of dust.

EDIT

Assume any initial mass distribution $\rho(r,t=0)$ and momentum distribution $p(r,t=o)$ and state equation of dust.

EDIT 2

I don't intend to throw away the fluid concept,but still want to arrive at a particle as some form of a mass distribution.One example could be $\rho_p(r,t)$ which has a compact support in r describing a particle.

EDIT 3

Assume there are a number of such particles as described in the earlier edit part of the question as $\rho_p(\vec{r}-\vec{r_i},t=0)$ for $i = 1,2,3,...$. distributed arbitrarily in space such that no two are overlapping. This could be considered as $\rho(r,t=0) = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{i=0}^n \rho_p(\vec{r}-\vec{r_i},t=0)$. Similarily for momentum distibution at $t=0$ as $\vec{p}(r,t=0) = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{i=0}^n \vec{p_p}(\vec{r}-\vec{r_i},t=0)$. What would eventually happen to such a system under its own newtonian gravity. Just out of curiosity what would happen if GR is assumed.

share|improve this question
1  
Can you improve the question by putting your starting assumptions in equation form? It's hard to tell exactly what you mean here. –  Sklivvz Dec 4 '10 at 9:33
    
@Sklivvz : i have updated the question –  Rajesh D Dec 4 '10 at 9:38
    
For what it's worth, Newtonian gravity in the case of fluids with mass less than planetary orders of magnitude is more or less negligible. –  Justin L. Dec 5 '10 at 18:24
    
I think you should take a look at Landau Volume 6, and read the section in chapter 1 which describes the difference between the concept of a point particle and a fluid particle. Keep in mind that a "fluid particle" consists of a very large number of atoms, and the velocity distribution in the NS equation describes the motion of fluid particles, not point particles. –  Matt Dec 5 '10 at 23:49
    
Under Newtonian Gravity, I believe this system will begin to rotate and condense; and under GR I believe it will form a black hole in the limit of infinite time. –  Matt Dec 5 '10 at 23:50

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

If I understand your question correctly you want to get from Gauss' gravitational law to Newton's.

$$ \nabla \cdot \textbf{g} = -4 \pi G \rho$$

Integrating both sides over a volume $V$ enclosing a mass $M$ and having surface $S$.

$$\int_{V} \! \nabla \cdot \textbf{g } \mathrm{d}\textbf{V} = -4 \pi G \int_{V} \! \rho\ \mathrm{d}\textbf{V}$$

$$\int_{V} \! \nabla \cdot \textbf{g } \mathrm{d}\textbf{V} = -4 \pi G M$$

Using the divergence theorem: $\int_{V} \! \nabla \cdot \textbf{g } \mathrm{d}\textbf{V} = \oint_{\partial{V}} \textbf{g} \cdot \mathrm{d}\textbf{S}$

$$\oint_{\partial{V}} \! \textbf{g} \cdot \mathrm{d}\textbf{S} = -4\pi GM $$

Assuming that $\textbf{g}$ is constant over $\mathrm{d}\textbf{S}$, and that the force is centripetal we can write $$\textbf{g} = g(r){\textbf{e}_r}$$

where $\textbf{e}_r$ are the unit vectors of the acceleration that point towards the center on the surface $S$ and g(r) gives us the magnitude of the acceleration at radius $r$.

Our equation then becomes:

$$g(r)\oint_{\partial{V}} \! \textbf{e}_r \cdot \mathrm{d}\textbf{S} = -4\pi GM $$

$$g(r) 4\pi r^2 = -4\pi GM $$

$$g(r) = -\frac{GM}{r^2} $$

share|improve this answer
    
Is this what you are looking for? –  Sklivvz Dec 4 '10 at 10:31
1  
I'll just add that to get from third to fourth line one needs a Stokes' theorem. –  Marek Dec 4 '10 at 10:38
    
Correct, I forgot to mention it. –  Sklivvz Dec 4 '10 at 10:44
    
@Sklivvz : I don't intend to throw away the fluid concept,but still want to arrive at a particle as some form of a mass distribution.One example could be $\rho_p(r,t)$ which has a compact support in $r$ describing a particle. –  Rajesh D Dec 4 '10 at 11:01
1  
It's notoriously chaotic and has many different endgames, depending on the starting conditions. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-body_problem and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-body_problem –  Sklivvz Dec 4 '10 at 17:51

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.