Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Quite a few of the questions given on this site mention a photon in vacuum having a rest frame such as it having a zero mass in its rest frame. I find this contradictory since photons must travel at the p of light in all frames according to special relativity.

Does a photon in vacuum have a rest frame?

share|improve this question
related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/29082 –  Ben Crowell Jul 19 '13 at 22:40

3 Answers 3

up vote 13 down vote accepted

Short answer: no.


Many introductory text books talk about "rest mass" and "relativistic mass" and say that the "rest mass" is the mass measured in the particles rest frame.

That's not wrong, you can do physics in that point of view, but that is not how people talk about and define mass anymore.

In the modern view each particle has one and only one mass defined by the square of it's energy--momentum four vector (which being a Lorentz invariant you can calculate in any inertial frame): $$ m^2 \equiv p^2 = (E, \vec{p})^2 = E^2 - \vec{p}^2 $$

For a photon this value is zero. In any frame, and that allows people to reasonably say that the photon has zero mass without needing to define a rest frame for it.

share|improve this answer
I agree completely with @dmckee and would only add that for any particle the elapsed time experienced by that particle in it's rest frame is called the proper time and can be calculated (in units where $c=1$) by any observer as $$d\tau^2 = dt^2 - d\vec{x}^2$$ and for a photon in a vacuum the proper time is always identically $0$. So photons do not experience any passage of time so in that sense also, they do not have a rest frame. –  FrankH Oct 21 '11 at 19:58
And in QM the photon energy is $\hbar\omega$ and $\omega$ in a medium is the same, so $m_{photon}=0$. –  Vladimir Kalitvianski Oct 21 '11 at 20:41

Your answers are right,a solitary photon has no rest frame, nonetheless I find quite interesting to note that a system of massless particles(such as photons) can have a nonzero mass provided that all the momenta are not oriented in the same axis and that for such systems zero momentum frames CAN actually be defined.

share|improve this answer

Not at all. Rest frame is a concept that does not exist in nature. Had it would exist, nature wouldn't be causal. A photon propagating through medium does not 'move' in a speed smaller than the speed of light in vacuum. It simply interacts electromagnetically with the medium and these interactions slows down its propagation through the medium.

share|improve this answer
"Rest frame is a concept that does not exist in nature." That's a strange way of stating things. If (in SR) in some frame $L$ you observe a (massive) particle moving at a speed $v < c$, you can most definitely pass to some frame $L'$ in which the particular doesn't move. –  Gerben Oct 22 '11 at 11:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.