Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Looking at the radius and mass of stars on Wikipedia, I see that the Sun is the densest of all, often many times denser than other stars. Is that because only non-dense starts are easily seen from a distance? Are there any stars of comparable luminosity to the sun that can be seen with the naked eye, and do they have a similar density as the sun?

If needed I can copy-paste the mass and radius of other stars here for reference.

share|improve this question
    
The statement in this "question" is wrong, afaik. –  Georg Oct 17 '11 at 5:53
1  
I don't know enough about this for a complete answer but to my understanding, the sun is bright because it is dens. The high concentration of particles caused them to fall one toward the other releasing. The more matter there is, the stronger the gravity and the more dense the star will be. Most of the stars you see at night are suns which are very dense. –  Yotam Oct 18 '11 at 9:20

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The answer lies in the selection bias towards brighter stars. There are two reasons this makes the Sun look relatively dense.

The first is in Martin's answer. Looking at a list of brightest stars, many (e.g. Betelgeuse, Aldebaran, Antares) are red giants. These are stars that have finished burning hydrogen into helium in their cores and are much larger in size than main-sequence stars like the Sun. As a result, their mean densities are small.

The second effect is that the more massive a main-sequence star is, the smaller its mean density but the greater its luminosity. So again, more massive stars on the main-sequence (e.g. Rigel) are easier to see but also have lower mean densities.

If you compare the Sun to stars from a list of Sun-like stars, you'll find it isn't unusual.

share|improve this answer

The sun is the same density as other dwarf stars.
Most of the visible stars are red giants, because red giants are, well giant, and so quite bright and visible.
Red giants are much lower density than the sun because although they started as much smaller stars with a mass of only a few times that of the sun, they have changed (as their fuel reactions change) to produce much large cooler atmospheres - and so lower densities.

On the other hand there are stars much much denser than the sun, although these are small and less bright so not easily visible,

share|improve this answer
3  
Just to be clear - the Sun is a dwarf star, but it is brighter than 95% or so than all stars. Its just another example of the observation bias noted in the answer. If the names of categories of stars were redone today, the Sun's category would likely be renamed to 'majorly awesome' or perhaps some more scholarly equivalent. –  Tom Andersen Oct 17 '11 at 1:31
    
@Tom - indeed if I was in charge of labeling Jeans anything with a leg length>waist diameter would be labelled "freakishly tall and skinny"! –  Martin Beckett Oct 19 '11 at 15:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.