Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I wonder, why is not CO2 one?

Are the issues with air transparency at 10um? Or it's impossible to focus on large distances due to diffraction?

share|cite|improve this question
Do You know of some way to produce short (milliseconds or less) pulses with MW or more power from a CO2 laser? – Georg Oct 16 '11 at 19:22
@Georg Wikipedia says that TEA Q-switched ones can have peaks in this area : 10GW peaks. High-pressure TEA lasers should have insane power if scaled to 747 size :-D – BarsMonster Oct 16 '11 at 19:53
@BarsMonster - the YAL-1 emits over a megawatt continuously for several seconds (not pulsed!). According to Sam's Laser FAQ, the largest CO2 laser is 120kW and is the size of a small house. – user2963 Oct 17 '11 at 16:47
One last comment - even the MW output of the COIL system is considered to be more than an order of magnitude too low for an effective weapon. – user2963 Oct 17 '11 at 16:48
@zephyr I see... thanks. – BarsMonster Oct 18 '11 at 8:12
up vote 3 down vote accepted

COIL is 1.3um compared to 10.6um for CO2 so to get the same diffraction limit your optical components and telescope have to be nearly 10x large diameter. You can also route 1.3um through optical fibre (although I don't know if this weapons system does this) more efficiently than 10.6um and it's close enough to optical wavelengths that you can do a lot of setup and alignment with visible light.

Regular CO2 lasers operate on continual output, you can Q-switch them but even then I don't think you get the very high pulse energy of a COIL.

share|cite|improve this answer
COIL is not a pulsed system - it emits hundreds of kilowatts sustained for a multi-second burst. – user2963 Oct 17 '11 at 16:39

I think the as the laser is used for an airplane weapon system, it has to have a good power vs. weight ratio. The used laser is directly fed by the chemical reactants while the CO2 laser would rather use electrical power, thus having the need for additional electrical generator systems.

So the chemical laser system may give a better power to weight ratio, like a combustion engine running on fuel outperforms a electric engine running on batteries in weight, even if the electric motor is small and lightweight.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.