Physics tension question [closed]

Two blocks are pulled across a frictionless surface by a $240\ N$ force, as shown in the diagram below: $60\ kg$ - - - cord - - - $20\ kg$ → $240\ N$. If the blocks are accelerating at $3\ m/s^2$ what is the tension of the cord in between the two blocks? So I don't really have a strategic approach to this problem. I Isolate $20\ kg$ and see that $f = (20\ kg)(3\ m/s^2)$. Therefor it takes 60 newtons for that block to accelerate at $3\ m/s^2$ and the other 180 newtons are used to pull the second block and therefor $180\ N$ is the tension.

1. Is that correct, my teacher never gives me the answer sheet :(
2. Is there a step by step approach I can apply to tension questions?

Thanks a lot!

-

migrated from math.stackexchange.comSep 29 '11 at 3:08

This question came from our site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields.

closed as off topic by dmckee♦Sep 30 '11 at 1:30

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Yes, that's correct. Another way to see this is that it takes 180 N to accelerate the 60 kg body at 3 m/s², and the only place that force can come from is the tension in the cord. –  Rahul Narain Sep 28 '11 at 21:31
@joriki: You're right, but when I attempt to migrate this question to physics.SE it doesn't seem to work. I'll leave it open for now, and I've created a meta thread about this problem. –  Zev Chonoles Sep 28 '11 at 21:48
Welcome to Physics.SE! Alas this question was not well migrated as our FAQ states that we do not work elementary exercises qua elementary exercises. We do address question about basic concepts (we even have a meta question to help). That said you are bang on. –  dmckee Sep 30 '11 at 1:33