Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm reading a book on the finite element method. Specifically I'm looking at the background material where they are discussing potential energy, equilibrium, and the Rayleigh–Ritz method.

The book claims that potential energy is equal to strain energy + work potential energy. I see that strain energy is like spring energy from a spring being stretched or compressed. However, I don't see what work potential represents. I feel that if a spring system is perturbed via forces, the work put into the system should be equal to the amount stored in the springs. (By integrating f(x) over x). The book seems to suggest otherwise since they are simply multiplying the force applied in the equilibrium position, times the displacement.

What's going on here, and especially what is the intuitive meaning behind work potential?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

They probably mean external work (load * displacement) potential; summed with (inner) strain potential gives total potential energy. See e.g. here (just a quick search).

share|cite|improve this answer

I know which book you are referring to. It is the book "Finite elements in Engineering" by Chandrupatla and Balegundu.I also have the same question. We learnt in Physics that the Work done by the force is stored as Potential Energy. There was no mention of Work Potential.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.