Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Continuing from the my previous 2-state system problem, I am told that the observable corresponding to the linear operator $\hat{L}$ is measured and we get the +1 state. Then it asks for the probability that +1 is measured again if the system is measured again at $t$. I would have thought that this probability is 1 since measurement projects the system into the first measured outcome such that successive measurements are consistent. But clearly I am mistaken, since it also asks to show that the probability = 0 for t = $\pi\hbar\over \Delta E$. 

Could anyone please explain to me what is going on? Thanks.

share|improve this question
The measurement does project the state, but unless $[H,L]=0$ it doesn't have to stay that way. –  wsc Sep 2 '11 at 11:43
Thanks, wsc. Would you mind explaining that a little bit more? –  justcurious Sep 2 '11 at 11:48
@justcurious the time evolution of an observable is $\frac{d}{dt}O=\frac{i}{\hbar}\left[H,O\right]+\frac{\partial}{\partial t}O$ just as in analytical mechanics where instead of the commurator, you take the poisson bracket. –  luksen Sep 2 '11 at 14:11
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

...since measurement projects the system into the first measured outcome...

That part is true...

...such that successive measurements are consistent.

...but that part isn't. Although a measurement of $\hat{L}$ does put the system into the eigenstate of $\hat{L}$ corresponding to the measured eigenvalue, it doesn't mean it's going to stay in that state - after all, the time evolution of the system (i.e. the Schroedinger equation, Heisenberg equation, evolution operator... however you want to describe it) doesn't stop just because you made a measurement.

Mathematically, when you make a measurement, you use the eigenstate as an initial condition for the evolution equation to figure out what happens in the future.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.