Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Given a 2-state system with (complete set) orthonormal eigenstates $u_1, u_2$ with eigenvalues $E_1, E_2$ respectively, where $E_2>E_1$, and there exists a linear operator $\hat{L}$ with eigenvalues $\pm1$,

  1. would the normalized eigenfunctions (in terms of the given eigenstates) just be $$u_1\over \sqrt{\int u_1^*u_1}$$ ? Since I am not given an argument/coordinate system for the eigenstates, perhaps I should first project them into one? But I don't have any info on the nature of the quantum system...

  2. A second question asks for the expectation values of the energy in the respective states. But isn't that just $E_1$ and $E_2$ respectively??

Grateful for any enlightenment.

share|improve this question
    
And what does that linear operator have to do with anything? –  justcurious Sep 2 '11 at 8:46
add comment

1 Answer

1) Yes. However, you say that $u$ are orthonormal which contains normalization

2) Yes. I presume, it some sort of a homework. Sometimes it is useful to check/show fact like this in details.

And what $\hat{L}$ have to do with the question?

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, Misha. Like I said in my comment to the problem, I really don't see the relevance of the linear operator... HenceI was confused... BTW, what sort of detail could I show? Isn't this all from definition? –  justcurious Sep 2 '11 at 9:21
    
Found the catch to the linear operator bit, there is apparently another bit of the question later on that has to do with it. But I still don't know how to "calulate" the expected energy for each of the states, since it seems to follow from definition...! –  justcurious Sep 2 '11 at 10:06
    
@justcurious It is not definition. State with energy usually means eigenfunction of Hamiltonian. Expectation value of the operator definition is a bit different. To go from one to another you still need one pretty obvious line. \\ You may reformulate the question right here. I can add new details in my answer. It is Ok. –  Misha Sep 2 '11 at 10:40
    
Thanks again, Misha. :) So $\langle E \rangle = \langle H \rangle$? Then we have to do $\int u_1^*Hu_1$ where $H$ is the Hamiltonian? Unfortunately, the question only has the information I have given in the question above... –  justcurious Sep 2 '11 at 12:45
    
Also, what argument would I be integrating with rescet to (since it is not given in the question)? –  justcurious Sep 2 '11 at 12:50
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.