Pade approximats are sometimes an alternative to a taylor approximation to a function. Imagine fitting (i.e. describing) some data with a taylor series
$D(x) = D_0 + D_1x + D_2x^2$
If this is a "correct" description of the data (i.e. higher order terms are negligible), then a Pade approximant should also describe the data. For example
$D(x) = \frac{D_0}{1-D_1x-D_2x^2}$
The reason is that the Taylor expansion of the second one is the same as the first expression plus some higher order terms that are "small". (This by the way is an explicit example of your question 2).
In many practical reasons, Pade approximants also do a nice job in describing data that have a singularity somewhere (not where you have data).
But I do not understand your questions:
1) If a series is divergent there is no way to sum it. A different thing is that you have the asymptotic expansion of a function (that can be a divergent series), and you want to reconstruct the original function (this is what Borel summation does, for example).
2) The rule is that if the taylor series is up to order $a$, then the sum of the orders of the numerator and denominator in the Pade approximant should also be $a$.
3) You can approximate the borel transform of a series by the Pade approximants, but I do not know if this would be useful...
4) Yes, they are a "good" approximation to a function, and then can be used as approximations to the integrals of the function.
Not sure if this is useful for you, in any case, If you tell us what you want to do, maybe we can help.