Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Imagine two blocks of masses $m_1$ and $m_2$ joined together by a spring of spring constant $K$.

Now let the spring be stretched by a distance $X$ and then the system is released. suppose during the stretching the block of mass $m_1$ moves towards left by a distance $A$ and the block of mass $m_2$ by a distance B.

Now the centre of mass of the system at any instant will remain at rest. Now let it be present at a point P in between the two blocks. so can I depict the oscillations of the two blocks as two independent oscillations about the centre of mass?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

The two oscillations will not be independent as they will share frequency and phase. You can start from Newton's equations of motion.

Two Mass & Spring

$$ m_1 \frac{{\rm d}^2\,a(t)}{{\rm d}t^2} = -F(t) $$ $$ \mbox{-}m_2 \frac{{\rm d}^2\,b(t)}{{\rm d}t^2} = F(t) $$ $$ F(t) = k \;\left( a(t)+b(t) \right) $$

Assume simple harmonic motion $a(t) = A \sin(\omega\,t)$, $b(t) = B \sin(\omega\,t)$ which leads to the frequency equation $$ k\,\left(m_1+m_2\right) = m_1 m_2 \omega^2 $$ and the amplitude equation $$ A\, m_1 = B\, m_2 $$ So now you can show that the center of gravity $P$ does not move as long as the amplitudes $A$ and $B$ obey the balance equation above. How? Well what is the equation for the center of gravity? $$ {\rm cg} = \frac{\mbox{-}B\,m_2+A\,m_1}{m_1+m_2} = 0 $$

share|improve this answer
    
Did you make that image just for this problem? –  Alan Rominger Aug 4 '11 at 14:24
    
yes - and it is pretty cruddy too. In fact, 80% of solving a problem is framing the problem and making a nice sketch of all relevant information. –  ja72 Aug 4 '11 at 16:08
    
I found it to be rather impressive. This is a high quality answer overall IMO. –  Alan Rominger Aug 4 '11 at 16:21
    
Well Thanks to all for your responses. –  Primeczar Aug 5 '11 at 16:23

Traditionally, the "mass on a spring" is analyzed with one end of the spring held fixed. Your problem is equivalent to two such systems back-to-back. You have identified the center of gravity as a fixed point; so you can literally fix it and then cut the problem in two. Each half of the system then behaves like a traditional "mass-on-a-spring".

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.