Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to understand a particular case of gauge theories, namely discrete spaces on which a group G can act transitively, with a gauge group H which is discrete as well.

From what I've already read about continuous and discrete gauge theory (I can provide the necessary references if needed*), it seems that the full gauge transformation group will be the semidirect product of G by H. However I'm unable to prove it...

Can someone point me to the proof of this fact ?

Any help greatly appreciated !

*Edit : The bottom of page 2 in this reference describes this kind of thing without giving any proof :

share|cite|improve this question
For those who are interested in the question, the OP asked something similar on math.SE the other day:… – Gerben Aug 3 '11 at 20:13
Indeed... I first thought it was more mathematic-relevant, but it didn't get much attention. I thought physicists would be more familiar with it... By the way, this semidirect product (even in the case of continuous groups) seem to have been lying all over the place for more than 50 years now, but an explicit proof is still missing (or obviously implicitly implied and in that case I missed it) – AlexPof Aug 3 '11 at 20:42
Have you checked out Ref. 1 from that paper? I can't acccess any articles behind a paywall ATM, but it seems like it could be useful. – Gerben Aug 4 '11 at 8:35
@Gerben: I have a lot of papers by the same Kornyak, but in all of them he merely gives the same statement without any proof – AlexPof Aug 4 '11 at 9:07
In the case of continuous principal bundles, the bundle automorphism group is an extension of the base space diffeomorphism group by the group of pure gauge transformations. A semidirect product is only a special case of such an extension. Going to the discrete case, one would also expect more general extensions than the semidirect product. Since nontrivial extensions (i.e., non-semidirect product extensions) exist for finite groups, I wonder why these cases are excluded here. Do you have a reference where it is stated that the full gauge group "must" be a semidirect product. – David Bar Moshe Aug 4 '11 at 11:39

The physical space is a space of orbits under $H$. That is, you start with some huge initial space $X$ but a little later you realize that many states represent the same physical state - any two of these are connected through the action of $H$. So, the physical space is $X / H$. Now, the physical space can be acted on by a symmetry group $G$. Now, to extend this to an action of $G \rtimes H$ on $X$ we need a connection.

Why is that? Well, we know how $H$ acts on all of $X$ and we know how $G$ acts on orbits of $X$ but we have no idea what does $G$ to the points in the orbit (besides the fact that they get all mapped to points in some other orbit). Connection is precisely the tool that gives us this identification of points between various orbits.

In the language of topology (all your sets and groups are finite and so we can give them discrete topology), $X \to X / H$ is a fibre bundle with vertical action of $H$. We are also given an action of $G$ on the base. And we'd like to lift it to a horizontal action of $G$ on all of $X$ but horizontal structure on the bundle is the same thing as connection. Now, once we have actions of both $G$ and $H$ on $X$, we can combine these two in an obvious way by twisting the horizontal action by the vertical action (similarly to how one can twist translations by rotations to get a full group of symmetries of Eucidean space).

share|cite|improve this answer
thanks for this explanation. However, I'm still confused when you say "...we can combine these two in an obvious way..." : I don't find that obvious at all... – AlexPof Aug 4 '11 at 13:35
@Alex: okay, sorry about that; I'll have to be more careful about what's obvious to me isn't obvious to someone else (also, perhaps I am just thinking it's obvious while there might be a catch hidden somewhere). I'll fill in the details later. But really, it's basically just doing the vertical and horizontal actions in sequence (it really helps if you can imagine this geometrically) and noticing that this operation has a structure of a semidirect product (i.e. trivial in one group component and mixing in the other). – Marek Aug 4 '11 at 18:40
Marek: since you seem to understand what's going on, I think it'd be useful - not only to the OP, but for future reference - if you could explicitly construct this group and show how it acts on a configuration. (Also, most physicists are more comfortable with $x \mapsto x + a$ and $\phi \mapsto U \phi$ than $X \rightarrow X/H$...) – Gerben Aug 5 '11 at 0:20
@Marek : is there a way to contact you directly (email, ...) ? I'd like to ask a couple more questions (if you agree, of course) but I don't want to start an endless trail of comments here... – AlexPof Aug 5 '11 at 19:08
@Alex. sure, I don't mind. It's marek dot bernat at gmail dot com – Marek Aug 6 '11 at 16:24

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.