Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there any reason the universe has matter not being able to exceed the speed of light, or why there is a speed limit in the first place?

I know why it can't, meaning the basic physics of it. I am just wondering if the reason why the universe is like this is or the benefit of it known.

I know this might be too philosophical, but I am just wondering.

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by ACuriousMind, John Rennie, Anixx, Qmechanic Aug 18 '14 at 15:16

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

See my or Trimok's answer here: – Void Aug 18 '14 at 14:49
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about philosophy of science, and not physics as such. The question Why does the universe follow scientific laws? has been asked at Philosophy a while ago. – ACuriousMind Aug 18 '14 at 14:50
possible duplicate of What is so special about speed of light? – John Rennie Aug 18 '14 at 14:55
up vote 1 down vote accepted

One aspect that comes to my mind is the concept of causality. Superluminal propagation would allow for a violation of this principle, creating various paradoxical phenomena.

share|cite|improve this answer
This would violate causality only if Lorentz transformationas are correct. With Galileo's transformations, it will not violate causality. – Anixx Aug 18 '14 at 14:59
@Anixx Since the speed of light as an upper limit is a concept from special relativity, which contains Lorentz transformations within its mathematical framework, I do not see how your statement is relevant. – Frederic Brünner Aug 18 '14 at 15:02
speed higher than speed of light violates causality only in special relativity. So it is special relativity that limits speed of light, not causality. If special relativity were wrong, speed of higher than light would not violate causality. – Anixx Aug 18 '14 at 15:05

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.