Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Reading the marvellous book "The Membrane Paradigm" I stumbled upon a suggested change of variable that I'm not able to deal with. Starting with the usual Schwarzschild metric for the spatial 3-geometry

$$ ds^2 = \frac{1}{f(r)} dr^2 + r^2 \left( d\theta^2 + \sin ^2 \theta \ d\phi\right)\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1) $$

where $ f(r) = 1-\frac{2M}{r}$ (that is simply Schwarzschild metric without time element $-f(r)\ dt^2 $) they suggest a new radial coordinate $R$ with the "property that $R-2M$ measures the proper radial distance outward from the horizon". This new variable is

$$ R= 2M + \sqrt{r(r-2M)}+\ln \left[ \sqrt{\frac{r}{2M} -1} + \sqrt{\frac{r}{2M}} \right].\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (2) $$

I'd like to see the new metric but I'm not able to invert (2) (namely find $r(R)$) to perform the coordinate change $$ ds^{2}=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}=g_{\mu\nu}\frac{\partial x^{\mu}}{\partial x'^{\rho}}\frac{\partial x^{\nu}}{\partial x'^{\sigma}}dx'^{\rho}dx'^{\sigma}=g'_{\rho\sigma}dx'^{\rho}dx'^{\sigma} $$

I tried also to use the inverse of the Jacobian as suggested in http://physics.stackexchange.com/a/43084 but at the end I always need at least to change the variable $r^2$ in the angular part of (1).

Do you have any idea on how to deal with it or how to invert (2) ?

share|improve this question
1  
You have certainly an error in $(2)$ : there should be a length term $[L]$ multiplying the $ln$ term. –  Trimok Aug 13 at 13:29
    
@Trimok I see your point. Actually it is correctly copied from the book, so the error should be in the book. BTW here $c=1$ everywhere. –  miskio1646 Aug 13 at 14:25

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

If I take the (corrected) formula :

$$R= 2M + \sqrt{r(r-2M)}+2M\ln \left[ \sqrt{\frac{r}{2M} -1} + \sqrt{\frac{r}{2M}} \right] \tag{1}$$

You have (if no error) : $dR = \dfrac{dr}{\sqrt{ 1 - \dfrac{2M}{r}}}$, so $dR^2 = \dfrac{dr^2}{f(r)}$, and this simplifies your metrics.

However, you cannot invert the formula $(1)$ to get $r$ as an explicit function of $R$. You will simply write the metrics :

$$ds^2 = dR^2 + (r(R))^2 \left( d\theta^2 + \sin ^2 \theta \ d\phi\right) \tag{2}$$ where $r(R)$ is implicitely defined by the equation $(1)$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.