Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a rather simple question about atomic clocks. I have read that:

Microwave radiation with a frequency of exactly 9.192.631.770 cycles per second causes the outermost electron of cesium-133 atom to reverse its spin direction. An atomic clock uses this phenomenon to tune moicrowaves to this exact frequency. It then counts 1 second for each 9.192.631.770 cycles.

So does that mean that in an interval of 1 second the outermost electron of the cesium-133 atom changes its spin direction 9.192.631.770 times? And let 1 and 2, be the two possible directions of spin. Does one change mean a change from 1 to 2 , or a change 1 to 2 and back to 1?

share|cite|improve this question

It does not mean that it switches the hyperfine state that often. I means that, if you hit the atom with a photon that (by $E = \hbar\omega$) corresponds to exactly that frequency, then the energy of that photon will precisely be the energy to lift the electron from the lower hyperfine state to the upper hyperfine state. If hit, it will then, as with all other orbital excitations, stay a short while in the upper state before dropping into the lower again, sending out a photon of exactly (modulo uncertainty) the same energy again.

All an atomic clock does is now to tune some kind of circuit so that it oscillates exactly with the same frequency as the photons/microwaves associated to this transition. (Not actually that easy)

share|cite|improve this answer
This is getting clearer to me, but I have asked @John the same question I am asking you now: So in a second, how many times does the electron switch positions? – Bardo Aug 3 '14 at 18:49
@Bardo: It doesn't switch back and forth, unless the same atom/electron is repeatedly hit by multiple photon. For a single photon, the process is just: "lower state -(photon hit)-> upper state -(photon emission)-> lower state." You could make them switch rapidly by turning up the intensity of the radiation (so that they are hit very rapidly), but that has nothing to do with the transition as such, and has no relation to the frequency of the photon, but would be purely a property of your particular setup. – ACuriousMind Aug 3 '14 at 18:54
Ok, but here it says that "The International System of Units (SI) defines one second as the time it takes a Cesium-133 atom at the ground state to oscillate exactly 9,192,631,770 times. ". So, for the Cesum-133 atom to oscillate, that outer electron needs to switch states, right? So it needs to switch states 9.192.631.770 time .. ? – Bardo Aug 4 '14 at 18:52
So, let me se if I get it: we somehow, I honestly don't care how yet, we somehow manage to apply a radiation of a given frequency $f$ that makes the Cesium-133 atom to change state. But it doesn't change its state 9 billion times in a second. The frequency we used, has that value. So an atomic clock works like this: we have Cesium-133 atoms. We hit them with different frequencies that cause them to behave differently. We have a device that allows us to see when an atom has gone from its lower energy state, to its highest. We save the frequency we used to attain this state, and that's it – Bardo Aug 4 '14 at 19:04
Then we come up with a clever way to make something oscillate with the exact same frequency that produced that phenomenon, and at the same time to be able to count the oscillations. And we have a clock! Is that right? – Bardo Aug 4 '14 at 19:07

If you measure the absorption of microwaves by a gas of caesium atoms you'll get a spectrum looking something like this:

Hyperfine absorption

NB not a real spectrum - I drew this as an illustration

When the microwave frequency is 9,192,631,770 Hz the microwave photons have exactly the right energy to flip the outer electron spin, so at this frequency they are more strongly absorbed than at nearby frequencies. Energy is absorbed from the microwaves to flip the electron spin, then the electron either reradiates a photon and relaxes back or it loses the energy and relaxes due to collisions with other caesium atoms.

The caesium clock works by tuning the frequency for maximum absorption i.e. exactly at the peak of the absorption line. Then it's just a matter of counting each cycle of your microwave generator, and after 9,192,631,770 of them one second has passed.

Response to comment:

The electron flips every time a caesium atom absorbs a microwave photon. So if we can work out how many photons per second are absorbed this will tell us how many electrons per second are flipped.

Suppose the microwave power is $P$, and the absorptance (the depth of the trough in the diagram above) is $f$, where $f = 0$ means no microwaves are absorbed and $f = 1$ means all the microwaves are absorbed. The the power absorbed is $Pf$. The energy of a photon is $h\nu$, where $\nu$ is the frequency of the hyperfine absorption 9,192,631,770 Hz. Then the number of photons absorbed per second, which is the same as the number of electrons flipped per second, is:

$$ N = \frac{Pf}{h\nu} $$

Alternatively, if $N_C$ is the number of caesium atoms in the clock then the number of times the electron is flipped per second per caesium atom is:

$$ N_a = \frac{Pf}{N_Ch\nu} $$

However I have no idea what power microwaves are used in an atomic clock or what fraction of the microwaves are absorbed, so I'm afraid I can't calculate the numbers $N$.

share|cite|improve this answer
So in a second, how many times does the electron switch positions? – Bardo Aug 3 '14 at 18:48
@Bardo: I've updated my answer to respond to your comment – John Rennie Aug 4 '14 at 4:59
There is something here that I don't understand but I don't know how to express it.. – Bardo Aug 4 '14 at 18:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.