Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When you compute the average potential energy of a horizontal spring mass system from the mean position to the positive amplitude A, the value comes out to be $\frac{1}{6}kA^2$. For the average kinetic energy over the same range and direction, it is $\frac{1}{3}kA^2$, which is double the average potential energy. What the physical explanation of the different average values of PE and KE?

P.S. No mathematical explanations please, i.e. area under the graph, etc, only explanations in terms physics of the event are appreciated. The question does not involve time averages of PE and KE. Snapshots of derivations can be uploaded if requested.

share|cite|improve this question
It's not clear to me what you mean by average value, especially when you specifically say it's not a time average. Can you extend your question to explain exactly what quantities you are calculating and comparing? – John Rennie Jul 30 '14 at 6:22
Just like in the plot of KE and PE vs X, where X is the distance from the mean position. Here taking the average of either KE or PE with distace we can get the average of the Y axis quantities wrt the X axis quantity, i.e. distance. – BibThePhysicist Jul 30 '14 at 7:22
up vote 3 down vote accepted

One can't discuss the difference between factors of $1/3$ and $1/6$ without mathematics. The difference between these two numbers – and generally, any fact about any numbers – is all about mathematics.

If all values of $x$ between $0$ and $A$ were equally likely, the average value of $kx^2/2$ would be $kA^2/6$ as you say because the average value of $X^2$ for $X$ uniformly distributed between zero and one is $$\int_0^1 dX\,X^2 = \left.\frac{X^3}{3} \right|^1_0=1/3$$ However, when the harmonic oscillator (you talk about a spring which is a harmonic oscillator) oscillates, it oscillates harmonically, via sines and cosines, so it spends much more time near the $|x|=A$ extreme points where the speed is low than it spends in the vicinity of $x=0$ where the speed is high.

If you compute the average value (over time) of $kx^2/2$ in this oscillating motion, the result will be proportional to the average value of $\cos^2 t$ over time which is equal to $1/2$. So the average kinetic energy of the oscillating motion will be $kA^2/4$ – a number that doesn't appear in your list of results at all.

Similarly, the maximum value of the kinetic energy is $mv_{\rm max}^2/2 = kA^2/2$ at the maximum achieved exactly when the potential energy $kx^2/2$ has the minimum value (zero). Similarly, the minimum value of the kinetic energy is $0$ exactly when the potential energy $kx^2/2$ is maximized i.e. at $|x|=A$.

The average contribution of the kinetic and potential energy to the total energy is the same for the harmonic oscillator – both averages are $kA^2/4$ – a fact that is guaranteed by the "virial theorem".

No factor of $1/3$ ever appears in the correct average values for the harmonic oscillator (just like it doesn't appear in the right solution to the sleeping beauty problem).

share|cite|improve this answer
Completely satisfied with your answer. – BibThePhysicist Jul 30 '14 at 17:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.