Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A common theme in aquatic science fiction is the submarine pool/access to the ocean. That terrible TV show Seaquest had it, The Deep & Deep Blue Sea (Samuel L Jackson is standing in front of it when the shark chomps him). My question is how this could possibly work? From what little knowledge I have, I'd say the cabin where the pool resides would have to be pressurized to the water at that depth. The implications are that you'd have to pass through an airlock to get to the room, and that it would only work to a certain depth.

Is this correct, or it too far to the "fiction" side of the science fiction axes?

share|improve this question
4  
It's a real thing that is used in real underwater laboratories, it's called a moon pool. –  Kyle Kanos Jul 23 at 2:58
2  
It's not much qualitatively different from a diving bell –  tpg2114 Jul 23 at 2:58
    
Thanks Kyle! Could you add that as an answer and i'll mark it as such. –  George R Jul 23 at 3:06
    
@KyleKanos I missed your comment. I couldn't recall the name! –  BowlOfRed Jul 23 at 3:07

3 Answers 3

up vote 14 down vote accepted

Is there a particular way that you think this scheme will fail?

Rather than have an airlock with that particular portion of ship, you can simply pressurize the entire vessel. There are practical reasons why you would not want to do this at great depths (related to how much gas you use and toxicity), but the problems are not related to how the access works.

Given sufficient gas, it will work to any depth. You simply need the air in the vessel to be at the same pressure as the water at the point of access is.

This access is called a moon pool. The wikipedia page has some examples of its use underwater. Moonpool habitat examples

share|improve this answer
3  
Just to second this -- the physics of keeping the water out is not science fiction at all, that's entirely possible. But breathing highly pressured gas can be very toxic. That's really where the science fiction comes in. But an underwater lab at a few hundred feet, where underwater is most interesting, wouldn't be a problem. Sealab 2020 anybody? –  tpg2114 Jul 23 at 3:03
    
I'm pretty sure it's Sealab 2021 –  Kyle Kanos Jul 23 at 3:08
3  
@KyleKanos Kids these days (although you are older than I am)... Sealab 2020. –  tpg2114 Jul 23 at 3:25
2  
@tpg2114 "But breathing highly pressured gas can be very toxic" Correction. Breathing highly pressurized AIR can be very toxic. Its really all about partial pressure. At depth one normally breathes very lean hypoxic gas mixes, which aren't toxic. –  Aron Jul 23 at 9:09
    
@tpg2114 A quick google suggests that a rough rule of thumb for wariness of nitrogen narcosis is 30m or 100ft. I couldn't find a similar figure for likelihood of decompression sickness, but I'd expect it to be not dissimilar. In either case, wouldn't being in a submerged vessel with pressure equalised to the water at that depth be quite hazardous to the passengers at such a depth as you're suggesting? –  Tom W Jul 23 at 11:17

The implications are that you'd have to pass through an airlock to get to the room, and that it would only work to a certain depth.

Correct x 2.

You have 2 choices with an underwater habitat - build it really strong to take the pressure, or just pressurize it and you can make the whole thing out of plastic.

Submarines chose the former, as they may need to surface quickly and don't want the crew exploding when they open the hatch. Exiting a sub below a certain depth is not possible, and a small hole can create a steel-cutting jet inside. Descending below crush depth is ..... bad.

If you want to put something on the bottom with a convenient door you just raise the internal pressure of the whole thing to match the external pressure. Done for underwater construction all the time. Mixing the gases is important but also not complicated, the crew goes to the surface in a pressurized diving bell and spends a lot of time decompressing. Accidents do happen, and are rather spectacular. Look up "Byford Dolphin" in the usual place for the gory details. In theory this will work all the way down to the Mariana Trench, if you can get a powerful enough air compressor.

share|improve this answer
    
"Submarines chose the former..." Exactly. And that's exactly what the "secret labs" in these scifi shows are supposed to be. –  Joe Blow Jul 23 at 13:02

You can do it without raising the internal pressure. First you have your pool, at 1 atm or ambient inside the vessel. Then you have a wet chamber which can be sealed at both ends. Enter the pool, then only the inner door of the wet lock opens, enter this area, and close the door to the moon pool behind you. When the internal door is shut you can open the external door. External water pressure never reaches the internal pool. The mass / volume of water inside the wet lock won't change so it won't push back into the atmosphere of the habitat. You couldn't use this as an unprotected diver since you would explosively decompress every time you re-entered the vessel interior (because it's at 1 atm and you have just entered from a significantly higher pressure zone) But it would serve to protect the atmosphere inside the vessel and can be used with 1 atm suits or subs.

share|improve this answer
    
This is a wet lock but the question asks about viability of a moon pool that goes directly to the outside. No pressure chamber –  Jim Jul 23 at 14:42

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.