Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The generators of the Poincare group $P(1;3)$ are supposed to obey the following commutation relation to be verified:

$$\left[ M^{\mu\nu}, P^{\rho} \right] = i \left(g^{\nu\rho} P^{\mu} - g^{\mu\rho} P^{\nu} \right)$$

where $M^{\mu\nu}$ are the 6 generators of the Lorentz group and $P^\mu$ are the 4 generators of the four-dimensional translation group $T(4)$.

For $\mu = 3, \nu=1, \rho=0$ the LHS becomes: $ [M^{31},P^{0}] = M^{31}P^{0} - P^{0}M^{31}$.

Here $M^{31} = J^2 = -J_2= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & i & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$ and $ P^0 = P_0 = -i \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$.

My question is that how can I multiply $M^{31}$ and $P^0$ when they are $4\times4$ and $5\times 5$ matrices respectively?

share|improve this question
2  
In fact you need to complete the $M_{ab}$ generators with zeros to complete the 5th row and column. –  Dox Jul 22 at 17:35
    
Related question by OP: physics.stackexchange.com/q/127559/2451 –  Qmechanic Jul 22 at 17:41
    
@Dox: I have considered: $(x^0, x^1, x^2, x^3) \rightarrow (x^0 + b^0, x^1+b^1, x^2+b^2, x^3+b^3)$. Then cast this transformation as a matrix multiplication and then used the formula to find the generators $P_\mu=g_{\mu\nu}P^\nu$. What else I could do to define the $P_\mu$ properly? –  Ome Jul 22 at 17:45
    
@Qmechanic: yes, I asked that question. I was in deep confusion! –  Ome Jul 22 at 17:51

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Consider $$M_{31} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -i & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & i & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \text{ and } P_0 = -i \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix},$$

Then the commutator vanishes! As expected from $\left[ M_{31}, P_{0} \right] = i \left(g_{10} P_{3} - g_{30} P_{1} \right) = 0$.

If you take $$M_{01} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & i & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ i & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \text{ and } P_0 = -i \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix},$$ then $$ \left[M_{01},P_0\right] = -i \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = P_1. $$

And so on!

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.