Sign up ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Can Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle be rewritten in terms of energy density

writing $$\Delta E \Delta T \geqslant \hbar/2$$ in factors of energy density $\Delta \sigma \text{ }= \frac{3\Delta E}{4\pi r^3}$

I get $$\Delta \sigma \frac{3\text{$\Delta $T}}{4\pi r^3} \geqslant \hbar/2$$

does $$\frac{3\text{$\Delta $T}}{4\pi r^3}$$ represent something?

Or does it make more sense to write $$\text{$\Delta $x} \frac{\text{$\Delta $E}}{c^2} \geqslant \frac{\hbar}{2}$$

EDIT after noting Willie's comment I've corrected the form to $\frac{\hbar}{2}$

However, now I see c is constant and can be moved to the right side - is it mathematical correct to write $$\text{$\Delta $x} \text{$\Delta $E} \geqslant \frac{\hbar c^2}{2}$$ or does this violate the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality? This is the question I was trying to understand at the beginning.

share|cite|improve this question
Your algebra's not right. The correct expression should be $\frac{4}3 \pi r^3 \Delta\sigma\Delta T \geq h/2$. – Willie Wong Jul 23 '11 at 1:18
Really? Ok - but I was using Kennard's "Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen" where planck's unit is modified by h/4Pi. Sorry, wenn mein Englisch ist neunzehnten Jahrhunderts – metzgeer Jul 23 '11 at 3:56
""Sorry, wenn mein Englisch ist neunzehnten Jahrhunderts "" So, congratulation to more than 111 years of age! :=) – Georg Jul 23 '11 at 9:52
Please fix the question! The factor of c should not be squared, it should be $\Delta X \Delta E \approx \hbar c$, the density form is also wrong, as Willy Wong said. – Ron Maimon Sep 18 '11 at 8:14

1 Answer 1

It seems that you are missing what $\Delta T$ is here. It is not an interval of time. It is time uncertainty. Which is not what usually called $\Delta T$. The most standard application for this uncertainty principle is a linewidth. From this inequality you know that lifetime in upper state limits lower bound of energy dispersion. The larger lifetime the more precise your energy measurement (may be).

As a consequence, there is no use to convert this $\Delta T$ to $\Delta x$. It will mean not what you expect.

The same holds for $\Delta E$. It is not a real energy of some object.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.