I'm looking at Section 2.4.1 of Nielsen and Chuang's Quantum Computation and Quantum Information were they derive the density operator versions of the evolution and measurement postulates of quantum mechanics and something is bugging me.
Let
$\{(p(i), | x_i \rangle) \colon i=1,2,...,n\}$
be an ensemble and suppose you perform a measurement on this ensemble that results in outcome $m$. Then the post-measurement ensemble is
$\{(p(i|m), | x'_i \rangle) \colon i=1,2,...,n\}$
where $p(i|m)$ is the probability that the state of the system was originally $| x_i \rangle$ given that the measurement outcome was $m$. It seems natural enough to use $p(i|m)$ for the probabilities of the post-measurement ensemble. However, mathematically, I do not see why that should be the case.
My question then is this: Given only the definition of what an ensemble is and the state vector version of the postulates of QM, is there a way to derive the rules to compute the post-measurement probabilities of an ensemble?