Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can anyone give an example of when infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces are required to describe a physical system? The standard answer to this question is yes, and I'm sure some of you will be quick to point out several clear examples:

Ex. 1: Photon number states $\left\{ |0\rangle,|1\rangle,...,|n\rangle \right\}$

Ex. 2: Harmonic oscillator number states (same as above).

Ex. 3: Continuous-variable basis of a single free particle $\left\{ |x\rangle \right\} \forall x \in \mathbb{R}$

From the infinite number of basis vectors in these examples, it is generally concluded that the dimension of the Hilbert space is also infinite.

However, it is clear that a photon number state such as $|\psi\rangle=|100\rangle$ is unphysical (to be clear, this is the Fock number state with $n=100$, not a tripartite state with one photon in one channel). If you dispute this, I would suggest you try preparing such a state in a single-mode fiber in an optics lab. For this reason, we can apply a (somewhat arbitrary) cutoff value of $n$ and recover a finite-dimensional Hilbert space.

Similarly, the cardinality of the basis set for a free particle is actually $\mathbb{N}$, not $\mathbb{R}$ (due to the properties of the function space), and although this set of orthogonal functions is infinite, we can also apply a similar cutoff for any reasonably behaved wavefunction.

Can anyone give an example of a system described by an infinite-dimensional vector space for which such a cutoff cannot be applied?

share|improve this question
2  
I'm confused about what you're asking exactly. Infinite dimensional complex Hilbert spaces certainly exist as mathematical objects. Moreover, they can be used to model certain physical systems accurately. It seems to me that you are asking if you can somehow always get away with modeling these same systems with finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Is my impression correct? If so, I'd humbly suggest a rewording of the question along these lines. If not, then please clarify. –  joshphysics Jun 27 at 3:28
2  
$$[x,p]=i$$ does not have a finite dimensional representation. –  user26143 Jun 27 at 6:46

1 Answer 1

Isn't your Ex 3 such an example?

In any event, you might have trouble producing a pure photon state $\left|\,001\right>$, but you should have no trouble creating a coherent state. Just turn on your laser pointer. The coherent state is a superposition of single photon states, summing over all single photon number states. You can't impose a cutoff.

See this Wikipedia article, in particular search for the phrase "This can be easily seen" and look at the equation that follows.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.