Was wondering if trapping light in a reflective chamber could heat rods sufficiently enough to heat water? Trying to think of new ways in which we can utilise solar energy.

|
Was wondering if trapping light in a reflective chamber could heat rods sufficiently enough to heat water? Trying to think of new ways in which we can utilise solar energy.
|
||||
|
|
|
Yes, harnessing light can be a good way to heat water to usable hot temperatures, i.e. 50 to 80 degrees Celsius. The two factors that are important are the surface area of your collector (which looks quite small in your design), and the efficiency of the system. Typically, we use either flat plates (high area) or (partially-)evacuated tubes (high efficiency). Sunlight is around 1kW per square metre at the surface in full sun, and thermal collector efficiencies might be in the range 50-90% or so. Depending on where on earth you are, you might get 1-7 full sun hours per day. External air temperatures, collector tilt, alignment, and your latitude, will all affect the result. For a home in the UK, solar thermal energy should be sufficient for a small installation to meet half the home's annual hot water demand. If you can tap into larger-scale seasonal storage, or you're closer to the equator, you can increase that proportion. Here's an Evacuated-tube diagram from wikipedia's article on solar thermal collectors:
|
|||||
|
|
Any mirror can reflect light onto an absorbing rod, and increase the
heat transfer to that rod. A 'reflecting chamber', however, sounds like
a black body made with reflecting surfaces and a few absorbers, and THAT is
less effective in proportion to the number of reflections before light hits
the target. Reflecting surfaces may be 95% reflective, but all will absorb
at least a LITTLE light, which will therefore not produce heat in the
absorbing rods. There's also the problem of the light that inevitably
gets scattered out of the aperture, which might just hit your mirrors
and exit without ever encountering any target. |
|||
|
|