0
$\begingroup$

In "Mechanics" book by Landau and Lifshitz, $\S18$ "Scattering", problem 7 on deducing the form of scattering field given the effective cross-section as a function of scattering angle an equation is obtained:

$$-\pi\text{d}\log w=\text{d}\left(\frac s w\right)\int_0^{s^2/w^2}\frac{\chi'(x)\text{d}x}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2}{w^2}-x}}.$$

Before this, several variables have been introduced: $s=1/r, x=1/\rho^2, w=\sqrt{1-\frac U E}$, where $U>0, U(\infty)=0$.

They then say:

This equation can be integrated immediately if the order of integration on the right-hand side is inverted. Since for $s=0$ (i.e. $r\to\infty$) we must have $w=1$ (i.e. $U=0$), we have, on returning to the original variables $r$ and $\rho$, the following two equivalent forms of the final result: $$w=\exp\left\{\frac1\pi\int_{rw}^\infty\cosh^{-1}\left(\frac{\rho}{rw}\right)\frac{\text{d}\chi}{\text{d}\rho}\text{d}\rho\right\}=\exp\left\{-\frac1\pi\int_{rw}^\infty\frac{\chi(\rho)\text{d}\rho}{\sqrt{\rho^2-r^2w^2}}\right\}.$$

As I understand, they integrate taking $\frac s w$ as variable of integration. This seems OK, and I tried to take integral with the seemingly sensible limits from $0$ to $\frac s w$ (i.e. variable upper limit), but the result for RHS appears quite strange: denoting $\frac s w=\beta$, here's what I get after switching order of integration:

$$\int_0^\beta \text{d}x\chi'(x)\int_0^\beta\frac{\text{d}\beta}{\sqrt{\beta^2-x}}=\int_0^\beta\text{d}x\chi'(x)\left(\log\left(\beta+\sqrt{\beta^2-x}\right)-\log\sqrt{-x}\right).$$

Given that $x=1/\rho^2$, the RHS seems to become complex, which makes me think I do something wrongly. I suspect that I'm taking wrong limits of integration, but L&L don't specify which ones are to be taken! Supposedly the readers could determine this themselves, but I'm not as smart.

So, what are the right limits of integration here?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

I did not checked the computation, but the logarithm in the last equation is related to the inverse hyperbolic cosine http://mathworld.wolfram.com/InverseHyperbolicCosine.html.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

What I did wrong here was switching order of integration. Let's integrate from $0$ to $\beta'$, preserving the variable $\beta=\frac s w$ I introduced in the OP, and priming it to avoid confusion with integration variable. The RHS integral will then look as

$$\int_0^{\beta'}\text{d}\beta\int_0^{\beta^2}\frac{\chi'(x)\text{d}x}{\sqrt{\beta^2-x}}=\mathcal I.$$

Its domain of integration looks like:

enter image description here

Here we integrate over $x$ from $0$ to the curve, then over $\beta$ from $0$ to the top horizontal line. So, to switch order of integration, we should integrate from the curve to the top over $\beta$, then over $x$ from left to right. So, we get:

$$\mathcal I=\int_0^{x(\beta')=(\beta')^2}\text{d}x\int_{\beta(x)=\sqrt x}^{\beta'}\frac{\chi'(x)\text{d}x}{\sqrt{\beta^2-x}}=\\ =\int_0^{(\beta')^2}\text{d}x\chi'(x)\left.\left(\cosh^{-1}\frac \beta {\sqrt x}\right)\right|_\sqrt x^{\beta'}=\\ =\int_0^{(\beta')^2}\text{d}x\chi'(x)\cosh^{-1}\frac{\beta'}{\sqrt x}.$$

After substitution of the previously introduced variables, the result in Landau & Lifshitz is easy to get.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.