Tell me more ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there a particle called "tachyons" that can travel faster than light? If so, would Einstein's relativity be wrong? According to Einstein no particle can travel faster than light.

share|improve this question
5  
It is Tachyons, and have a look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon . It answers your question. – anna v Jun 20 '11 at 14:05
4  
also, Tokyons are quanta of East Asia radiation... – Marek Jun 20 '11 at 15:29
1  
@anna: that could be an answer. – David Zaslavsky Jun 20 '11 at 16:11

2 Answers

As a matter of fact, Einstein's theory of relativity is what predicts the possibility of tachyons (faster-than-light particles) - or rather, relativity is what makes tachyons special. Without relativity, particles moving faster than light would just be really fast particles.

Although it's often said that Einstein's relativity says that nothing can move faster than light, that's not actually true. What special relativity actually says (among many other things) is that anything which moves slower than light will always move slower than light, anything which moves at the speed of light will always move at the speed of light, and anything which moves faster than light will always move faster than light. Effectively, nothing can cross the "barrier" of light speed. So there is nothing in relativity that forbids the existence of tachyons.

However, based on relativity and other theories, we can predict certain properties that tachyons would have, if they exist, and they turn out to be rather strange. For example, their mass would have to be represented by an imaginary number. Also, a tachyon would get faster and faster as it loses energy, as opposed to normal particles, which need to gain energy to increase their speed. If you follow this sort of reasoning far enough, eventually you wind up with nonsensical results. Combined with the fact that no sign of a real tachyon has never been observed, this leads most physicists to believe that tachyons either do not exist, or are prohibited (by some as-yet-unknown law of physics) from interacting with normal matter.

If you're interested in learning more, I would second the suggestion that you check out the Wikipedia article that anna linked to in a comment.

share|improve this answer
The second paragraph is completely new information to me. Very interesting. – OmnipresentAbsence Mar 4 at 18:23

In AWT (dense aether model) the true tachyons are the gravitational waves, which we can observe as a CMBR noise. The photons of wavelenght longer than the wavelenght of CMBR are weak tachyons and they escape from gravity field of black holes in form of Hawking radiation just because of it. As a weak tachyons they're conditionally stable and they undergo quantum decoherence. The neutrinos of energy higher than the CMBR energy are behaving like weak tachyons too. They're tied to space-time brane and as such they remain conditionally stable (they undergo the quantum decoherence and oscillations too).

share|improve this answer
Why is this answer down-voted? – TestSubject528491 Nov 10 '12 at 1:50
@TestSubject528491 because it's not mainstream physics. – David Zaslavsky Dec 29 '12 at 10:01

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.