Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would like to understand what is meant when one introduces a generator $G(z)$ as the superpartner of the energy-momentum tensor $T(z)$.

  • How does one decide that this $G(z)$ should have a "conformal weight" of $\frac{3}{2}$ ?

  • How are the following OPEs for it derived ?

$T(z)G(w) = \frac{\frac{3}{2}}{(z-w)^2}G(w) + \frac{ \partial_w G(w) } {z-w} + ... $

$G(z)G(w) = \frac{ \frac{2c}{3} }{(z-w)^3} + \frac{2T(w)}{z-w} + ... $

  • If one wants to here create a $\cal{N}=2$ superconformal algebra then one apparently needs to introduce two such conformal weight $\frac{3}{2}$ supercurrents say $G^1(z)$ and $G^2(z)$ (with OPEs as above) and another "$U(1)$ current" $J(z)$ such that,

$ G^1(z) G^2(z) = \frac{ \frac{2c}{3}}{(z-w)^3} + \frac{2T(w)}{(z-w)} + i( \frac{2J(w)}{(z-w)^2} + \frac{\partial _w J(w)} {(z-w)} ) +... $

$T(z)J(w) = \frac{J(w)}{(z-w)^2} + \frac{ \partial _w J(w)} {(z-w)} + ...$

$ J(z)G^{1/2}(w) = \pm \frac{ iG^{2/1}(w)}{(z-w)} + ... $

$J(z) J(w) = \frac{ \frac{c}{3} }{ (z-w)^3 } + ... $

I would be grateful if someone can give some explanations about how the above construction is made.

Especially regarding the need and motivation to introduce the field $J$ (..and its OPEs..)

share|cite|improve this question

I don't know much about supersymmetry but in absent of any other answers, maybe you will benefit infinitesimally from my guesses.

Lets think in terms of a non-interacting SUSY theory with a bosonic and a fermionic field $S \sim \int\text d^2z\left(\partial X\bar{\partial}X - \left(\psi\bar{\partial}\psi + \bar{\psi}\partial\bar{\psi}\right)\right)$. Then from space-time symmetries we have a conserved energy-momentum tensor $T(z) = T_{boson}(z) + T_{fermion}(z)$ (no coupling, since they don't interact), and similarity for the anti-holormorphic part. It is then very natural to guess that your $G(z)$ is nothing but the conserved charge coming from supersymmetry (which could be to derive from Noether's theorem). Now, we know that we have a primary field $\psi(z)$ (the fermion) with $h_{\psi}=\frac 12$ and $j(z)=i\partial X(z)$ (the boson) with $h_j=1$. It is natural to guess that $G(z)$ is a combination of $\psi(z)$ and $j(z)$, which potentially could make it a primary field with conformal dimension $h_G = h_{\psi} + h_j = \frac 32$. The $T(z)G(w)$ OPE is nothing but the statement that $G(z)$ is an primary field with $h_G=\frac 32$. The $G(z)G(w)$ OPE should then be derived by using the OPE's of $\psi(z)$ and $j(z)$ together with Wicks theorem, as usual.

For the $\mathcal N = 2$ case, I have no idea. If you are less lazy than me and actually carry out this calculation, please write a comment on whether it works or not.

WARNING: the content of this answer is not thought through and could be completely wrong.

EDIT: Regarding why $G(z)$ is called a superpartner to $T(z)$. I vaguely remember that one usually do supersymmetry in terms of superspaces and superfields. My guess would be that one can construct a super (field) energy-momentum tensor, probably of the form $\sim G(z) + \theta T(z)$, and then they are "superpartners" in this sort of way.

EDIT2: @Arnirbit, in my answer I assumed knowledge of some basic aspects of non-supersymmetric 2d CFT. In particular the free boson and fermion (I must declare myself as newcomer to CFT and therefore not an expert).

Now to your questions. A primary field is a field which transforms in a particularly "nice" way under conformal transformations $(z,\bar z)\rightarrow (f(z), \bar f(\bar z))$,

$$ \phi(z,\bar z) \rightarrow \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\right)^h\left(\frac{\partial \bar f}{\partial \bar z}\right)^{\bar h} \phi\left(f(z),\bar f(z)\right),$$ where $\phi(z,\bar z)$ is a primary field with conformal weight $(h,\bar h)$. There are a connection between transformation properties of fields and OPE's, one can for example show that a primary field of weight $(h,\bar h)$ have the following OPE with the energy-momentum tensor $$ T(z)\phi(w,\bar w) = \frac h{(z-w)^2}\phi(w,\bar w) + \frac 1{z-w}\partial_w\phi(w,\bar w) + \text{regular terms},$$ and similar for the anti-holormorphic part (one way to derive this is by using Ward-identities). This equality must of course be interpreted as valid under a time-ordered correlation function. Another property of primary fields is that their two-point function is by symmetry fixed to be $$ \left<\phi(z,\bar z)\phi(w,\bar w)\right> = \frac C{(z-w)^{2h}(\bar z-\bar w)^{2\bar h}}.$$

Now, lets concentrate on the free Bosonic theory $$S[X] = T\int\text d^2z\;\partial X(z,\bar z)\bar{\partial}X(z,\bar z).$$ The equations of motion is $\partial\bar{\partial}X(z,\bar z) = 0$, meaning that $j(z)\equiv i\partial X(z,\bar z)$ is holormorphic (depends only on $z$, not $\bar z$) and similarly for $\bar j(\bar z)\equiv i\bar{\partial}X(z,\bar z)$. One can calculate the two-point function $\left<X(z,\bar z)X(w, \bar w)\right> \propto \log\left|z-w\right|^2$. This does not have the above form, and therefore $X(z,\bar z)$ is not a primary field! However $$\left<j(z)j(w)\right> = -\left<\partial_zX(z,\bar z)\partial_wX(w,\bar w)\right>\propto -\partial_z\partial_w\log\left|z-w\right|^2 = \frac 1{(z-w)^2}.$$ This says that $j(z)$ is a (chiral) primary field with conformal dimension $(1,0)$, with the OPE $j(z)j(w) = \frac 1{(z-w)^2} + \dots$ (if you like fancy words, this OPE gives you a $\mathfrak{u}(1)$ affine Kac-Moody algebra). You can calculate the energy-momentum tensor which will be of the form $T(z) = -\gamma :\partial X\partial X: = \gamma :jj:(z)$, for some appropriate constant $\gamma$ and normal ordering $:\; :$ is necessary on the quantum level. Using Wicks theorem one finds $$ T(z)j(w) = \frac 1{(z-w)^2}j(w) + \frac 1{z-w}\partial_wj(w) + \text{regular terms}, $$ which again says that $j(z)$ has conformal dimensions $(h,\bar h) = (1,0)$. A similar analysis for the free fermion will tell you that $\psi$ is a primary field with $(h,\bar h) = (\frac 12, 0)$ and give you the OPE $\psi(z)\psi(w) = \frac 1{z-w} + \dots$ (and similarly for $\bar{\psi}$).

If you are not already familiar with all this, then my quick sketch will not be sufficient and I recommend you to consult a textbook. Finally, I think that when you combine the free bosonic and free fermionic theory in a supersymmetric way, then you can find out why $G(z)$ with conformal weight $h = \frac 32$ appears.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your reply. Can you elaborate as to what you are defining as "primary field" of which you consider $\psi(z)$ and $j(z)=i\partial X(z)$ to be examples? (..i can hardly connect between the various things that I see being called as "primary" fields!..) Also kindly explain as to what OPEs you have in mind among the $\psi$s and $j$s. – user6818 Jun 20 '11 at 10:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.