It seems to me that the SI units we use today are nothing but the result of a historical 'coincidence'.
I recently began researching about natural (absolute) systems of units, which are defined in such a way that selected universal physical constants are normalized to unity. These are very convenient, since almost all equations in physics are simplified.
Take for example the Planck units, where five fundamental physical constants take on the numerical value of 1.
To quote from Wikipedia:
Planck units have a profound significance since they elegantly simplify several recurring algebraic expressions of physical law by nondimensionalization. They are particularly relevant in research on unified theories.
Planck units are even dubbed "God's units", since Planck units are free of anthropocentric arbitrariness.
I know that many 'everyday' quantities for a physicist in terms of Planck units would be very small numbers (for instance) but that shouldn't be a problem if we use scientific notation. In fact, it's a great thing since it can give us a better picture about those quantities being now in a unit system which is conceptually linked at a fundamental physical level. Besides, many such 'everyday' quantities are also expressed by very small / very large numbers in SI units. Think Planck's constant.
Frank Wilczek even argues that using Planck units would help us re-frame important questions in physics:
We see that the question is not, "Why is gravity so feeble?" but rather, "Why is the proton's mass so small?" For in [Planck] units, the strength of gravity simply is what it is, a primary quantity, while the proton's mass is the tiny number [1/(13 quintillion)].
AI am aware that it would be a big upheaval if we are to change our SI units but if it is to be done it better be done right now before more physicists grow up using the old unit system. The change is not likely to render old written material useless since, for instance, Newton's Principia Mathematica remains a fundamental text in mechanics even though it uses outdated notions such as "quantity of motion" and "quantity of matter".
Given all that I explained, is there a reason we choose to stick with the old and weary unit system?
Why didn't we leave the kilogram, defined by an arbitrary French rod, to ladies gossiping about Kim Kardashian's weight and choose something that makes more sense scientifically?