Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Watching one of Feynman's lectures, I came across something that puzzled me. What was Feynman referring to when he said the following?

What goes on in no matter how tiny a region of space and no matter how tiny a region of time, according to the laws as we understand them today, takes a computing machine an infinite number of logical operations to figure out. Now, how could all that be going on in that tiny space? Why should it take an infinite amount of logic to figure out what one stinky little bit of space-time is going to do?
Richard Feynman

Edit: I see a close vote was cast, the reason being that the question is unclear. My question is, why would Feynman say it would take an infinite amount of logic to simulate even a small region of space-time?

share|improve this question
    
what do you think? –  jinawee May 5 at 22:43
    
@jinawee I have no idea what he might have been talking about. Continuity of space-time, maybe? But that can't be it, we already knew about Plank distance and time back then. –  Paul Manta May 5 at 22:50
3  
He's talking about the fact that there are an infinity of feynman diagrams you can draw without legs. Technically, all of these contribute to the amplitude for (cube of spacetime) evolving to (cube of spacetime) –  Jerry Schirmer May 5 at 23:30
2  
A less extreme example is the fact that just writing down the wavefunction for an iron atom in the position basis is impossible, because even if you discretize space into 1000 segments along each direction, it would still take more digital storage space than the universe could hold. –  DumpsterDoofus May 5 at 23:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.