Sign up ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

I wondered whether the Fermi-Dirac Statistics describes the anti-fermion particles. Does it include the anti-particles?

share|cite|improve this question
Particles and their anti-particles both should have the same statistics -- so both bosonic or both fermionic. Bosonic examples: $\pi^{\pm}$ or $W^{\pm}$. – Siva Apr 29 '14 at 16:15

1 Answer 1

up vote 9 down vote accepted

Antiparticles naturally arise when studying the Dirac equation within quantum field theory. Recall that we may expand a Dirac spinor field as a plane wave, namely,

$$\psi= \sum_{s=1}^2 \int \frac{\mathrm{d}^3 p}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2E_{p}}} \left[ b^s_p u^s(p)e^{ipx}+c^{s\dagger}_p v^s(p)e^{-ipx}\right]$$

and similarly for the conjugate field. Notice the appearance of two distinct creation and annihilation operators; these give rise to the electron and positron, the antiparticle.

The Dirac spinor transforms under a representation of the double cover of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ which is a reducible representation. Hence we may propose a decomposition or ansatz,


where $u(p)$ is a four-component Dirac spinor which may be broken down into a set of two-component spinors known as Weyl spinors (and with a reality condition, Majorana spinors):

$$u(p)=\left( \begin{array}{c} \sqrt{p\cdot \sigma}\, \xi\\ \sqrt{p \cdot \sigma}\, \xi\\ \end{array} \right)$$

for $\xi^{\dagger}\xi=1$. The antiparticle, a positron, corresponds to a negative frequency solution, namely,

$$v(p)=\left( \begin{array}{c} \sqrt{p\cdot \sigma}\, \eta\\ \sqrt{p \cdot \sigma}\, \eta\\ \end{array} \right)$$

where $\psi=v(p)e^{+ipx}$ instead. Notice both solutions have positive energy, as

$$E=\int \mathrm{d}^3 x \, T^{00}=\int \mathrm{d}^3 x \, \bar{\psi}(m-\gamma^i \partial_i)\psi \geq 0$$

(The above expression is obtained by applying Noether's theorem to the spacetime translation symmetry giving rise to energy-momentum tensor.)

Both the electron and positron are fermions, obey the same quantum field theory, and satisfy Fermi-Dirac statistics which - roughly - dictate we quantize the theory using anti-commutation relations rather than commutation relations, otherwise we would obtain a Hamiltonian unbounded from below.

share|cite|improve this answer
So, if I remember the derivations correctly, we can say that from Dirac's equation we directly get both antiparticles and the statistics. Right? – Davidmh Apr 29 '14 at 19:50
@Davidmh: What do you mean by "get statistics from the Dirac equation"? – JamalS Apr 29 '14 at 19:52
@Davidmh: The Fermi-Dirac distribution is derived using a statistical ensemble. In a way quantizing using anti-commutations arises because commutation relations are inadequate, and hence they are the only reasonable canonical quantization alternative. – JamalS Apr 29 '14 at 19:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.