Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sorry if this is a trivial question, but I do not know enough physics to answer this on my own.

Can there exist a satellite that revolves around a planet so large such that the planet covers the entire sky as seen from at least one point on the satellite?

Added 1 I am sorry for being unclear earlier. But assume human eyes can't resolve less than $0.02^\circ$.

Added 2 Assuming both the planet and satellite (ignoring atmosphere to make things simpler) are spheres and since spheres are locally euclidean, for large enough radii a planet could cover the whole sky as it appears to the eye. Consider this picture: enter image description here

share|improve this question
Interesting problem in general relativity. –  Carl Brannen Jun 14 '11 at 22:37

3 Answers 3

No, because, if you assume spherical shapes for both satellite and main body, this would only be (geometrically) possible if they touch at the point where you stand.

It would be possible if you stand in a hole on the satellite, the walls of which obscure part of the sky.

As for the case of main body and satellite orbiting each other and nearly touching, I think this is theoretically possible (if neither has an atmosphere), but not a stable configuration. I'm no astronomer, though.

share|improve this answer

If the planet and satellite are perfect spheres, or any convex shape then the answer is NO. If the planet is close to the satellite and you stand on the point nearest to it then you will only be able to see a small band around the horizon, but the whole horizon cannot be blocked.

If the satellite is not convex and you stand in a hole or crater on the satellite so that your view of the sky is reduced then the planet can fill the rest of the visible sky, so the answer is YES.

If the satellite itself is a sphere then the planet cannot obscure the whole horizon unless the satellite somehow passes through a tunnel or at least a gorge in the planet, not very likely

Update: Since the question has been updated there are a couple of extra points to be made

If the observer on the satellite is limited by the resolution of his vision then a sufficiently big planet could obscure the whole sky with the only band of sky left near the horizon being too small for him to see.

Also, regarding Carl's comment on the effect of GR. If the planet is sufficiently massive, but not the satellite, then light will bend towards the centre of the planet. In this case it is possible for the planet to cover the whole sky in the most extreme circumstances.

As mentioned in the comments on this answer, an atmosphere on the satellite would bend the light towards the satellite making it harder for a plenet to cover the whole sky.

If the atmosphere is on the planet it could only help if the satellite was inside the atmosphere, in which case the drag would slow it down so that it would not remain in orbit for very long.

share|improve this answer
@Philip: What if the satellite had a thick atmosphere, causing the light from planet to be refracted? –  qftme Jun 12 '11 at 18:39
@qftme Can the satellite keep its thick atmosphere when under the gravity of the near very large planet? –  M.Sameer Jun 12 '11 at 19:42
@M.Sameer: Good point. I don't know, guess we'll have to wait for a planetary physicist to pitch in. I was merely pointing out that the refractive properties of an atmosphere would be an exception to both the "no" answers so far. The whole situation was pretty hypothetical from the start.. –  qftme Jun 12 '11 at 22:50
@M.Sameer. In a hypothetical way, we could make the density of the planet low enough that tidal forces don't rip the atmosphere off the satellite. In any realistic case, atmospheric drag, and tidal effects would cause the satellite to impact the planet. –  Omega Centauri Jun 12 '11 at 23:39
@Omega , In this case the thick atmosphere @qftme proposed might do the trick and make the planet cover the whole sky view. –  M.Sameer Jun 12 '11 at 23:48

I think if the satellite gets that close you have to consider tidal drag (as well as atmospheric drag it there is one present), which would mean any super close orbit would decay on a timescale that is small compared to astronomical timescales. The planet must be rotating slower than the orbital speed at its equatorial radius, otherwise it would be unstable, and mass/angular momentum would be shed -presumably forming a ring which might condense into a moon. Also if there are any other bodies nearby, so that it isn't governed by two body dynamics, the orbit will vary with time, and unless the near grazing condition was the innermost approach of an oscillation, it probably wouldn't avoid an impact for long. Now if you want to select a special time, just before the satellite impacts the planet, then yes it can happen. In fact a satellite in a wrong way orbit will lose momentum due to tidal drag and spiral in until it impacts. I think that is your best scenario for reaching your scenario.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.