Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is meant by normalized projection operator? What is its physical meaning in quantum mechanics? I am pretty confused regarding the physical interpretation of both projection operator and normalized projection operator.

share|improve this question
It's sort of like casting a shadow (that's why they named it a "projection" operator). –  DumpsterDoofus Apr 12 '14 at 21:58

1 Answer 1

Suppose we have arbitrary vectors $|\alpha\rangle$ and $|\beta\rangle$ that are not necessarily aligned with one another. We can determine the component of $|\beta\rangle$ that lies along the direction of $|\alpha\rangle$ by defining an operator $$ \hat{P}=|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha| $$ which we call the projection operator. Note that $\hat{P}$ is considered normalized if $$\sum\hat{P}=\sum|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|=1$$ which is then the normalized projection operator.

We can then use $\hat{P}$ as, $$ \hat{P}|\beta\rangle=|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|\beta\rangle=\langle\alpha|\beta\rangle|\alpha\rangle $$ If, however, $\hat{P}$ is not normalized, then we must use $$ \hat{P}|\beta\rangle=\frac{\langle\alpha|\beta\rangle|\alpha\rangle}{\sum|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|} $$

As an aside, let's look at $\hat{P}^2$: $$ \hat{P}^2=\left(|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|\right)\left(|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|\right)=|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|=|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|=\hat{P} $$ where we used the fact that $\langle\alpha|\alpha\rangle=1$. This property is called idempotence and is a consequence of the fact that once you've projected a vector onto another vector, projecting it a second time gives you the same projection.

Using this property on a vector $|a\rangle$, $$ \hat{P}^2|a\rangle=\hat{P}|a\rangle \\ \left(\hat{P}^2-\hat{P}\right)|a\rangle=0 \\ \left(p^2-p\right)|a\rangle=0 $$ Where $p$ is the eigenvalue $\hat{P}$. The solution is either $p=0$ or $p=1$.

The eigenvectors for the appropriate eigenvalues must satisfy $$ \hat{P}|a\rangle=|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|a\rangle=|a\rangle\quad p=1 \\ \hat{P}|a\rangle=|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|a\rangle=0\qquad p=0 $$ For $p=1$, the appropriate eigenvector is $A|\alpha\rangle$ for constant $A$ (i.e., any vector parallel to $|\alpha\rangle$ is an eigenvector). For $p=0$, the appropriate eigenvector is 0 (i.e., it is orthogonal).

share|improve this answer
I don't think the eigenvalue part makes much sense, since even if $|\beta\rangle$ is not an eigenvector of $\hat P$, we always have $(\hat{P}^2-\hat P)|\beta\rangle=0$, since $\hat{P}^2=\hat P$. –  Adam Apr 12 '14 at 22:52
@Adam: The key is not to look at the $\hat{P}^2-\hat{P}$ part but to look at $\hat{P}|\beta\rangle$. This will either be $\mathbb 1|\beta\rangle$ or $\mathbb 0|\beta\rangle$ because it is either parallel or orthogonal to basis $|\alpha\rangle$. –  Kyle Kanos Apr 13 '14 at 0:19
I think you have a problem of notation then. You said $|\beta\rangle$ is not necessarily orthogonal to $|\alpha\rangle$, so you have in general $0\leq\langle\alpha|\beta\rangle\leq 1$, and therefore $\hat P|\beta\rangle=a|\alpha\rangle$ with $0\leq a\leq 1$ (that's the definition of a projector). –  Adam Apr 13 '14 at 1:01
@Adam: The aside is separate from the initial answer (before the thin solid line). I'll clean it up in a few minutes to assert that more clearly. –  Kyle Kanos Apr 13 '14 at 1:17
@Adam: Aside cleaned up. Let me know if this is still confusing. –  Kyle Kanos Apr 13 '14 at 1:41

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.