Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There are claims like this one that you can improve the cooling speed of beverages when you put them wrapped in a wet paper towel inside the refrigerator/freezer.

enter image description here

I've just tried it by myself and it seems it does not work as expected, although I might have confused freezer with refrigerator.

My question:

Is this kind of an urban legend or does it actually help?

share|improve this question
1  
Wrapping a wet paper towel around an object is definitely effective for cooling hot objects, and it has a very quick effect. I suspect the effect on already cold objects is much weaker. –  DumpsterDoofus Apr 11 at 11:59

3 Answers 3

up vote 4 down vote accepted

It may actually work, as evaporating liquids need heat to evaporate, and water will somewhat evaporate even in the fridge.

I am not sure it works in practice, because the paper also causes an adverse effect, it provides insulation,

Hard to tell which effect is dominant.

I'm pretty sure that the balance of both effects depends in a very large part on the physical structure of the paper used.
There are multiple independent physical effects in relation to the paper:

  • On the picture, we see there is air under or inside of the paper in some locations. I would think of the contribution to heat flow to be similar to the cooling from evaporation, except for the sign.
    This is related to the paper structure by depending on how "soft" the paper is - when it is wet, but was not wet for a long time.

  • the total effect of cooling is related to the time the surface of the paper stays wet, and after that, to the time the paper stays wet at all. The mention of a paper towel supports this idea, because paper towels are specifically optimized to keep water.

  • The inner surface area of the paper gets very relevant at the time the surface is not longer "fully wet".

  • For the relevance of the size of the paper's pores, the same holds like for the inner surface above.

  • If the water on and in paper freezes, the result is a layer of - depending on how wet it was - porous material, insolating relatively well.

  • Dry paper is insolating.


There are also relevant effects not related to the paper:

  • The air temperature influences the rate of evaporation. When it is colder, the evaporation is slower, so that the cooling effect is weaker when it's cold.

  • Evaporation depends on humidity of air. And humidity of air in a fridge largely depends on condensation on the surface of the cooling elements. That depends on the surface temperature, which in turn depends both on the user set temperature, but, to a large part on the geometry of the cooling element! [1] But, quite counter-intuitively, not directly on the fridges overall temperature as set by the user.

  • If it's very cold, the upper layer (or more) of the wet paper could freeze, leaving just a little sublimation instead of evaporation for cooling. See the paper section for paper related effects of freezing.

  • Some fridges use an internal fan to make move more cold air to goods hard to reach from the cooling element. As for the bottle moving more air around also means moving more moisture away, allowing for more evaporation, it could help the cooling effect a lot. Additionally, condensation of the moisture elsewhere in the fridge is made quicker in a similar/inverse way.


[1] Simplified, the geometry of the cooling element is about the area available to exchange heat. If it is large, a small temparature difference is enough for cooling. That reduces condensation on the element - keeping more moisture in the air. If it is small, it needs to be freezing cold, collecting moisture as ice. A medium size collects moisture by condensing to water - which is often removed through a small drain pipe. (Simplifying by ignoring the influence on convection near the cooling surface.)

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks! Is there a rough estimate on the percentage of improvement? Like 1-2% or more like 70-80%? –  Uwe Keim Apr 11 at 11:37
1  
Yea, I just noticed that's the part where the answer will start to be more complex than I expected... also more interesting, ...let me go grab a coffee :) –  Volker Siegel Apr 11 at 11:40
1  
@UweKeim Sorry, lost a proposed edit, in a conflict - not sure it was from you, but if so, feel free to ally it again, I'll take a break now :) –  Volker Siegel Apr 11 at 12:29
1  
+1 for the detail and correctness but -1 for using the "word" "guesstimate" –  Jim Apr 11 at 22:40
1  
@UweKeim Oh, indeed - I did not draw a conclusion, need to add something. Hmm... I would best describe it as saying "'It depends!' and then going on and on to explain aspects it depends on until getting tired and forgetting to state a conclusion." –  Volker Siegel Apr 12 at 18:37

I actually went ahead and spent some hours experimenting. Used two 500ml aluminum beer cans filled with water at room temperature, 21.4°C. One can wrapped in a paper towel soaked with an additional 20ml of water, one left bare as control. Shoved both in my small, non-ventilated house freezer at -14°C and measured temperature and weight every twenty minutes until water in both cans started forming ice. These are the results.

cooling chart

Allowing for some error from my cheap digital food thermometer, the towel-wrapped can cooled quite a bit faster than the control one. In fact, it reached the 4°C serving temperature in about 50 mins, more than an hour earlier than the control can. Notably, by that time it had already lost some 6ml of water, I suppose through evaporation/minor dripping, and ended up losing a total of 10ml by the end of the experiment (the control only lost 2ml).

So yes, the wet paper towel trick does seem to work quite nicely. I'd expect it to work even better if one were to use a ventilated freezer (faster heat exchange) and smaller containers (greater surface/volume ratio).

I also had a properly sealed beer can in there with a wet towel, same starting temperature, and it cooled to serving temp at about the same rate as the other can. A little quicker, because it wasn't taken out of the freezer for measurements until the 1-hour mark, when it was ready to be in my tummy.

Not very academic maybe, but I hope this provides some useful info!

share|improve this answer
    
Awesome, Andy! Thanks a lot! –  Uwe Keim Jun 22 at 6:24
1  
No Problem. Summer starts today and everybody should know how to best get a cool drink :D –  Andy Jun 22 at 6:27
1  
Excellent :-) A well deserved +1 (and a cold beer of course :-) –  John Rennie Jun 22 at 6:39

I believe the 'urban legend' you are referring to is about cooling a bottle when you do not have a refrigerator. On a hot and windy day you could store your bottle in the sunlight, but it would be better in the shade, but if you really wanted to cool the bottle by a few more degrees, the 'myth' says wrap it in wet paper or cloth. During the time when the paper/cloth is wet, evaporative cooling should affect the bottle. If paper or cloth dries out -add more water. The stronger the wind, the faster the cooling, and this should be enough to stop your beer being warm, or stop your milk going off too quickly. Putting it in the fridge as you suggested will keep it out of the cooling 'breeze', and the cold of the fridge will also slow the rate of evaporation and hence less cooling effect.

share|improve this answer
    
I have to ask: Is your answer a "yes" or a "no" to my question? (i.e. does it improve the cooling speed or not?) –  Uwe Keim Apr 12 at 17:23
1  
@Uwe Keim If you are putting the damped bottles in the fridge and expect a noticeable extra cooling, the I would say it is a no. Use the same idea out of the fridge then yes, you will get a noticeable cooling effect. Difference between the cooling in the fridge and out of the fridge is best determined by experiment, using thermometers rather than using your own tastebuds to determine which is cooler (more fun, but less scientific!) –  Judge Zeppelin Apr 12 at 18:13

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.