Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In studying about the Higgs field and related, I find little mention of the equilibrium point at -V. I would like help conceptualizing what a negative vacuum expectation value is, ideally with respect to the Higgs field. Do you have any hint on how to observe or create it?

share|cite|improve this question

Unfortunately I cannot comment to ask you for more details.

What exactly do you mean 'equilibrium point at -V'?

Is this the potential, $V(\phi^* \phi)$, or the VEV, $v$ ?

Is it the fact that we put $$ \mu^2 < 0$$ where $$ V(\phi^* \phi) = \mu^2 (\phi^* \phi) + \frac{\lambda}{4}(\phi^* \phi )^2 $$ that is bothering you?

The Vacuum Expectation Value (VEV) is, after spontaneous symmetry breaking, $$ \langle 0 \vert \phi \vert 0 \rangle = \phi_0 = \sqrt{ \frac{v^2}{2}} = \sqrt{\frac{-\mu^2}{2 \lambda}} $$

This is a positive quantity, since we must set $$ \mu^2 < 0$$ to spontaneously break the Mexican Hat potential $ V(\phi^* \phi)$ above.

share|cite|improve this answer
I'm talking about the VEV. I thought the VEV could be stable (at equilibrium) at v or -v, No? I must be misunderstanding a statement by Matt Strassler from link‌​: "Now, although I’ve set things up so that H could be either v or -v, it doesn’t matter whether the value of the Higgs field is positive or negative; the world comes out looking the same, with the same physics, because nothing depends on the overall sign of H." – lunchtime Apr 11 '14 at 8:15
I always found it better to view the higgs potential as a literal "mexican hat/wine bottle" potential, that is as a 3D bowl shaped object. In this way one can see that the dip on either side simply becomes a trough instead that causes there to be essentially one minimum value all around the middle at a location v from the center. (Of course this does then move into the realm of complex valued functions when we make the potential 3D and because of this technically the field has a phase which represents the infinitely many solutions around the circle, this is the subject of gauge symmetries) – Triatticus Apr 11 '14 at 9:03
Yes, I quite like that conceptual view of the trough of the wine bottle, except for the left-hand (negative VEV) side of the bottle! Perhaps this will elucidate what bothers me: In this link, Flip Tanedo puts it this way "A loose interpretation for the Higgs vev is a background probability for there to be a Higgs boson at any given point in spacetime." I'm bothered by a negative probability, and more so by a stable negative probability at -v. Obviously there is a hole in my understanding...what am I missing? – lunchtime Apr 11 '14 at 15:24
In the mexican hat potential there are minima at $re^{i\theta}$ for some $r$, and every $\theta$. Suppose then that the VEV is $\langle H \rangle = re^{i\theta_0}$. Then you can redefine the field $H$ as $H' = e^{-i\theta_0}H$, and $\langle H' \rangle = r$ is real and positive. Since the Lagrangian is real, this redefinition does nothing to it. – Robin Ekman May 15 '14 at 0:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.