Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider a system of particles with wave function $\psi$(x) (x can be understood to stand for all degrees of freedom of the system; so, if we have a system of two particles then x should represent {$x_1; y_1; z_1; x_2; y_2; z_2$}). The expectation value of an operator $\hat{A}$ that operates on is defined by : $$\langle\hat{A}\rangle = \int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi dx$$

Yup this makes sense to me and there's nothing new here.

If $\psi$ is an eigenfunction of $\hat{A}$ with eigenvalue $a$, then, assuming the wave function to be normalized, we have : $$⟨ \hat{A} ⟩ = a$$

This is where I want to confirm something.

$$\hat{A}\psi = a\psi$$

Hence, $$⟨ \hat{A} ⟩ =\int\psi^{*} a \psi dx$$

Since $a$ is a constant I can take it out :

$$\langle\hat{A}\rangle = a \int\psi^{*} \psi dx$$

We assumed that the wave function was normalized hence $$\int\psi^{*} \psi dx = 1$$

Leaving $$\langle\hat{A}\rangle = a$$

Now consider the rate of change of the expectation value of $\langle\hat{A}\rangle$:

$$\frac{d\langle\hat{A}\rangle}{dt} = \int{\frac{\partial}{\partial t}}(\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi)dx$$

$$=\int{\frac{\partial \psi^{*}}{\partial t}\hat{A}\psi+\psi^{}\frac{\partial\hat{A}}{\partial t}\psi^{*}}+\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}\hat{A}\psi^{*} dx$$

$$=\int{\langle\frac{\partial\hat{A}}{\partial t}\rangle} +\frac{i}{\hbar}\int{[(\hat{H}\psi)^{*}\hat{A}\psi-\psi^{*}\hat{A}\hat{H}\psi]}dx$$

where we have used the Schrodinger equation :

$$i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H}\psi$$

The second line is easily obtained via differentiation. The second term in the second line corresponds to the first term in the third line, correct ?

I do not see how this term was obtained. In particular where the $\frac{i}{\hbar}$ originates from :

$$\frac{i}{\hbar}\int{[(\hat{H}\psi)^{*}\hat{A}\psi-\psi^{*}\hat{A}\hat{H}\psi]}$$

Please help me.

PS : Take it easy on me. QM in general is quite new to me.

share|improve this question
    
What is your question? –  Kyle Kanos Apr 3 at 1:25
    
Give me a few minutes. I'm still editing my post :) –  Ari Ben Canaan Apr 3 at 1:32
1  
Okay. You don't need to write your equations as $<\hat{A}>$=$a$, simply use $\langle\hat{A}\rangle=a$ (i.e., surround single equation with $ for an inline equation and $$ for a centered equation) –  Kyle Kanos Apr 3 at 1:34
    
Alrighty, will have to make some changes to my latest edit then. –  Ari Ben Canaan Apr 3 at 1:54
add comment

3 Answers 3

up vote 1 down vote accepted

They have used the Schrödinger equation: $$i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H} \psi$$ And hence: $$\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{i\hbar}\hat{H}\psi$$

And since $1/i = -i$: $$\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = -\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}\psi$$

Similarly for $\psi^*$ we take the complex conjugate: $$\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial t} = \frac{i}{\hbar}(\hat{H}\psi)^*$$

Plugging these values into the integral gives us the last line you were confused about.

share|improve this answer
add comment

From the Schroedinger equation, $$i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\hat{H}\psi$$ simply divide by $i\hbar$: $$\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{i\hbar}\hat{H}\psi=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}\psi\\$$ where we used $$ \frac{1}{i}\cdot\frac{i}{i}=\frac{i}{i^2}=\frac{i}{-1}=-i $$

Now note that you've incorrectly applied the derivative. In quantum mechanics, $\hat{A}$ is an operator and acts on objects to the right: $\hat{H}\psi=E\psi$. That is to say, order matters: $\psi^*\hat{A}\psi$ is not necessarily the same as $\psi\hat{A}\psi^*$. As such, the line becomes $$\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial t}\hat{A}\psi+\psi^*\frac{\partial\hat{A}}{\partial t}\psi+\psi^*\hat{A}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} $$ (obviously ignoring the integral). This can be rearranged to give you the line you expected: $$\psi^*\frac{\partial\hat{A}}{\partial t}\psi+\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial t}\hat{A}\psi+\psi^*\hat{A}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} $$ So that first term is indeed the middle term of the previous line. The remaining two terms use the Schroedinger equation $$\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial t}\hat{A}\psi+\psi^*\hat{A}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} =\left(-\frac i\hbar\hat{H}\psi\right)^*\hat{A}\psi+\psi^*\hat{A}\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}\psi\right)$$ This should reduce to your solution (though I think the minus signs are different).

share|improve this answer
    
Yeah, I think that was more to do with my poor LaTeX skills. I was having a hard time trying to put everything in, but yes I am aware that the order matters. Thanks though ! –  Ari Ben Canaan Apr 3 at 2:30
1  
@AriBenCanaan, rather than dividing both sides by i, instead you can simply multiply both sides by i. E.g. iA = B, then iiA = iB, then -A = iB. I think this trick is easier than the divide by i suggested by Kyle and Nuclear, but ultimately it is just a matter of individual style, but it is good to know both. –  Mew Apr 3 at 2:38
    
Yes of course ! That does make sense too. I'm an organic chemist so you can see why QM isn't my strongest ! :P –  Ari Ben Canaan Apr 3 at 2:40
add comment

To arrive at the 2nd term of the third line, they have simply employed the SE equation, $$i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H}\psi$$

Re-arranging the above equation gives: $$\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = -\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}\psi$$

Therefore by replacing $\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}$ in the second line with $-\frac{i}{\hbar}\hat{H}\psi$, you will arrive at the 3rd line without too much trouble.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.