Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Physics can be modeled by dynamical systems $f^t(x)$ as well as by PDEs. The most common dynamical system has hyperbolic fixed point and can be an attractor or a repellor. The dynamics at repellors and attractors are simple exponential expansion or contraction and are represented by a Lyapunov exponent. My question is how could one prove or disprove that exponential inflation is just an example of a repellor with a Lyapunov exponent?

share|cite|improve this question
Do you have something particular in mind for exponential inflation? – Wrzlprmft Apr 2 '14 at 7:17
I can't say I fully understand this question, but there are several papers which use a Lyapunov exponent to describe inflation: and – DavePhD Apr 8 '14 at 16:30
you might want to change your title, as 'equating' is not the same as 'is just an example of'. – chris Apr 9 '14 at 8:35
@DavePhD your reply qualifies as an answer as the citations are a useful starting place for me. – Daniel Geisler Apr 9 '14 at 9:38
@DavePhD it is worth noting that neither of the papers you cited describe inflation with a Lyapunov exponent. They use the exponent to describe the exponential growth in the equations of motion of low-density matter and they both explicitly state that this description is done in a non-expanding universe – Jim Apr 9 '14 at 19:05

I suspect that you cannot prove it purely from experimentally/observational, and I think that approach is useless.

If you think that the whole universe as a single state in state space, then there is no way you can compare with any other state. You may think that there might be a phase space with (macroscopic) parameters $(V,\{\alpha_i\})$, so we can have a maximum Lyapunov exponents $\xi$ and a vector $\delta Z$ deviated from a state $Z_0$. The resulting state might be described by $Z_0+e^{\xi t}\delta Z$.

However, why do you need a phase space description? The other phase space states do not matter to us at all since we can't observe their dynamic. An exponential inflating universe can be simply described by $\dot{V}=kV$. In comparison, most dynamic system can actually be reproduced by repeating the experiments and this will give us the dynamic of the whole phase space.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.