Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I have a force, say 24 kg/cm what would that equate to at 2cm? I would like to know the formulae for calculating this. For example. If a motor can hold an object of 24kg at 1cm from its pivot point, what is it cable of holding at 5cm? And how is it calculated?

share|cite|improve this question
Oops, spelled metre wrong. I accidentally spelt it the American way – Mark W May 29 '11 at 15:15
This looks suspiciously like a homework problem. Have you tried the wikipedia article on forces, tension or Newtonian mechanics? – C Earnest May 29 '11 at 15:40
Nope. I am calculating lifting capabilities for a robot ARM for hobby robotics. I have googled for ages and cannot find the answer – Mark W May 29 '11 at 15:47
This sounds like what you are talking about: If it is not, could you maybe provide more details about the robot arm? – C Earnest May 29 '11 at 16:05
I have no details yet. I am playing with ideas to see what motor, arm length will be able to lift what, within my budget. – Mark W May 29 '11 at 16:30
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The units you mean are probably kg*cm (sometimes written in robotics). Your original specification of 24 kgcm is a torque and not a force. The difference in practice is that, as the units imply, your resulting force at a point a distance from the "pivot point" decreases by the distance. So 24 kg*cm means that it can hold 24 kg at 1 cm or 12 kg at 2 cm etc.

Notice that strictly speaking kg is not a standard unit of force in physics since the force of gravity on a kilogram varies. In robotics, this seems to be the standard unit of servo torque though.

share|cite|improve this answer
That's not what those units mean! 10 kg/cm would mean 10 kg at one cm, 20 kg at 2 cm, etc. (Compare with 60 miles/hour: 60 miles in 1 hour, 120 miles in 2 hours, etc.). But anyway, kg/cm don't seem to be the correct units here -- certainly, those aren't anything like the units of a force! I think C Earnest is right that what's being talked about here is really a torque, although it's hard to tell for sure. Torque comes in units of force times distance, not force per distance (N m vs. N/m). If what's being specified is a torque, then it does scale as you said: 2x the distance, 1/2 the force. – Ted Bunn May 29 '11 at 19:28
@Ted: ah sorry, both the OP and me must have misread; in robotics, the torque is specified in kgcm and not kg/cm :) I'll just remove the / sign from the post.. i've seen that servo spec so many times I just didn't notice the extra slash.. – BjornW May 29 '11 at 19:46
I was indeed refering to a torque. And have researched some more and discovered the lifting capability at 3cm would equal 8kg. (24/3=8) I believed the problem to be more complicated than it was. The only complicated part for me is factoring the weight of the lever itself. Thanks for all the help guys. – Mark W Jun 1 '11 at 12:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.